Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs Vivo iQOO Z11x
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo iQOO Z11x (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Turbo; launch prices were $2899 and $170. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 53/100 (a 16-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Z11x has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5600); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 983,562); the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo iQOO Z11x doesn't; the Vivo iQOO Z11x is noticeably lighter (190g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Vivo iQOO Z11x
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 983562
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1061
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 3185
- Faster charging: 45W vs 44W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 58/100)
- Better camera (52/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 56/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO Z11x better?
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5600 mAh
- Lighter: 190g vs 309g
- Cheaper at launch: $170 vs $2899
- Better display (79/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (60/100 vs 20/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs the Vivo iQOO Z11x, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 16 points higher (69/100 vs 53/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 58/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 30/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 46/100, Vivo iQOO Z11x — 74/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z11x (90/100 vs 58/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11x is a bit better (79/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z11x (52/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (63/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11x significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (60/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | Vivo iQOO Z11x | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Turbo | |
| AnTuTu | 2926532 | 983562 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 1061 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 3185 | |
| Display | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2160x1584 | 2400x1080 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5600 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 44W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | 1200 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | 166.6×78.4×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 309 g | 190 g | |
| Launch price | $2899 | $170 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo iQOO Z11x
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO Z11x
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2400x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo iQOO Z11x
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and Vivo iQOO Z11x, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Vivo iQOO Z11x by 197.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $2729. Vivo iQOO Z11x was $2729 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z11x (90/100 vs 58/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11x is a bit better (79/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z11x (52/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (63/100 vs 56/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11x significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (60/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo iQOO Z11x?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is noticeably better than the Vivo iQOO Z11x — the overall rating gap is 16 points.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Vivo iQOO Z11x?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has a MobileRank rating of 69/100, the Vivo iQOO Z11x — 53/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo iQOO Z11x?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (52/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo iQOO Z11x?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 58/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold over the Vivo iQOO Z11x?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.