Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs Vivo iQOO Z11x
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo iQOO Z11x (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Turbo; estimated prices are $2899 and $170. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 57/100 vs 37/100 (a 20-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Z11x has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5600); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 1,214,772); the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo iQOO Z11x doesn't; the Vivo iQOO Z11x is noticeably lighter (190g vs 309g).
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Vivo iQOO Z11x
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 1214772
- Better Geekbench Single: 3050 vs 1061
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9300 vs 3185
- Faster charging: 45W vs 44W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (67/100 vs 8/100)
- Better camera (49/100 vs 24/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 51/100)
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5600 mAh
- Lighter: 190g vs 309g
- Cheaper: $170 vs $2899
- Better design/ergonomics (62/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (98/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs the Vivo iQOO Z11x, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 20 points higher (57/100 vs 37/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (67/100 vs 8/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (49/100 vs 24/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11x leads (98/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z11x (67/100 vs 8/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z11x (49/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Vivo iQOO Z11x are nearly equal (52/100 vs 51/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11x significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (62/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11x significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (98/100 vs 0/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | Vivo iQOO Z11x | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Turbo | |
| AnTuTu | 2926532 | 1214772 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3050 | 1061 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9300 | 3185 | |
| Display | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2160x1584 | 2400x1080 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5600 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 44W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | 1200 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | 166.6×78.4×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 309 g | 190 g | |
| Price | $2899 | $170 |
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo iQOO Z11x
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO Z11x
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2400x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo iQOO Z11x
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
We compared Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and Vivo iQOO Z11x, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Vivo iQOO Z11x by 140.9% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $2729. Vivo iQOO Z11x is cheaper by $2729.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z11x (67/100 vs 8/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z11x (49/100 vs 24/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Vivo iQOO Z11x are nearly equal (52/100 vs 51/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11x significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (62/100 vs 0/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11x significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (98/100 vs 0/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo iQOO Z11x?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z11x by 20 points (57/100 vs 37/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Vivo iQOO Z11x?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has a MobileRank rating of 57/100, the Vivo iQOO Z11x — 37/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo iQOO Z11x?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (49/100 vs 24/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo iQOO Z11x?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (67/100 vs 8/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold over the Vivo iQOO Z11x?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for active users. The Vivo iQOO Z11x is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.