Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs Vivo iQOO 15R
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo iQOO 15R (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $2899 and $450. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15R leads — 73/100 vs 69/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15R has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 5600); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 2,817,788); the Vivo iQOO 15R is noticeably lighter (197g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Vivo iQOO 15R
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 2817788
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Better camera (52/100 vs 35/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 15R better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 3013
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 9287
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 5600 mAh
- Faster charging: 120W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 197g vs 309g
- Cheaper at launch: $450 vs $2899
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 90/100)
- Longer battery life (74/100 vs 63/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (62/100 vs 20/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs the Vivo iQOO 15R, the Vivo iQOO 15R scores 4 points higher (73/100 vs 69/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15R leads (74/100 vs 63/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 46/100, Vivo iQOO 15R — 70/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15R and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (93/100 vs 90/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15R notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (94/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15R (52/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15R is a bit better (74/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 15R significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (62/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | Vivo iQOO 15R | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 2926532 | 2817788 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 11047 | |
| Display | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2160x1584 | 2800x1260 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5600 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 120W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 8GB / 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | 5000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | 157.6×74.4×7.9 mm | |
| Weight | 309 g | 197 g | |
| Launch price | $2899 | $450 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo iQOO 15R
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO 15R
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2800x1260
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo iQOO 15R
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and Vivo iQOO 15R, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Vivo iQOO 15R by 3.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $2449. Vivo iQOO 15R was $2449 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15R and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (93/100 vs 90/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15R notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (94/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15R (52/100 vs 35/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15R is a bit better (74/100 vs 63/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 15R significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (62/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo iQOO 15R?
The Vivo iQOO 15R edges out the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Vivo iQOO 15R?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has a MobileRank rating of 69/100, the Vivo iQOO 15R — 73/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo iQOO 15R?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (52/100 vs 35/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold over the Vivo iQOO 15R?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo iQOO 15R is a better fit for gamers and power users.