Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Vivo iQOO 15R

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Vivo iQOO 15R (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $1299 and $450. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads — 83/100 vs 73/100 (a 10-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15R has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,437,807 vs 2,805,332); the Vivo iQOO 15R is noticeably lighter (197g vs 214g).

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is noticeably better than the Vivo iQOO 15R — the overall rating gap is 10 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
Performance 95
Display 88
Camera 86
Battery 61
Portability 51
Value for money 74
Vivo iQOO 15R
Performance 93
Display 94
Camera 35
Battery 70
Portability 62
Value for money 78
What makes Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3437807 vs 2805332
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (95/100 vs 93/100)
  • Better camera (86/100 vs 35/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 15R better?
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 3601
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 10686
  • Bigger battery: 6500 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 60W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 197g vs 214g
  • Cheaper at launch: $450 vs $1299

  • Longer battery life (70/100 vs 61/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 88/100)
  • Better portability (62/100 vs 51/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs the Vivo iQOO 15R, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra scores 10 points higher (83/100 vs 73/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (86/100 vs 35/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra — 74/100, Vivo iQOO 15R — 78/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and the Vivo iQOO 15R are nearly equal (95/100 vs 93/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15R is a bit better (94/100 vs 88/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15R (86/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15R is a bit better (70/100 vs 61/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 15R is a bit better (62/100 vs 51/100).

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra: The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.
Vivo iQOO 15R: The Vivo iQOO 15R is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Vivo iQOO 15R
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 3437807 2805332
Geekbench Single 3601 3640
Geekbench Multi 10686 11033
Display 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 3120x1440 2800x1260
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 6500 mAh
Charging 60W 100W
Wireless charging 25W 0W
DXOMark (camera) 157
Main camera 200 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 8 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 0 MP
Front camera 12 MP 16 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 8GB / 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 16 / One UI 8.5 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 2600 nits 5000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 163.6×78.1×7.9 mm 157.6×74.4×7.9 mm
Weight 214 g 197 g
Launch price $1299 $450
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 12MP
86
camera
Vivo iQOO 15R
  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 16MP
35
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
  • 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 3120x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
88
display
Vivo iQOO 15R
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2800x1260
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
  • 5000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:12 hrs, total 28:50 hrs
  • Wired: 60W
  • Wireless: 25W
61
battery
Vivo iQOO 15R
  • 6500 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • No wireless charging
70
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and Vivo iQOO 15R, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
83/100
3437807 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 15R Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
73/100 -22.5%
2805332 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads Vivo iQOO 15R by 22.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
$1299
Vivo iQOO 15R
$450

Launch price difference: $849. Vivo iQOO 15R was $849 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and the Vivo iQOO 15R are nearly equal (95/100 vs 93/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15R is a bit better (94/100 vs 88/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15R (86/100 vs 35/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15R is a bit better (70/100 vs 61/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 15R is a bit better (62/100 vs 51/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra or the Vivo iQOO 15R?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is noticeably better than the Vivo iQOO 15R — the overall rating gap is 10 points.

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and the Vivo iQOO 15R?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the Vivo iQOO 15R — 73/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra or the Vivo iQOO 15R?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads on camera score (86/100 vs 35/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra over the Vivo iQOO 15R?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Vivo iQOO 15R is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.