Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 vs Vivo iQOO 15R

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo iQOO 15R (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $1999 and $450. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads — 75/100 vs 73/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15R has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 4400); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is faster in AnTuTu (3,065,623 vs 2,817,788); the Vivo iQOO 15R is noticeably lighter (197g vs 215g).

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 edges out the Vivo iQOO 15R by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7

Performance 91
Display 78
Camera 76
Battery 39
Portability 66
Value for money 58

Vivo iQOO 15R

Performance 93
Display 94
Camera 35
Battery 74
Portability 62
Value for money 70

What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3065623 vs 2817788
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Better camera (76/100 vs 35/100)
  • Better portability (66/100 vs 62/100)

What makes Vivo iQOO 15R better?

  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 2910
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 9174
  • Bigger battery: 6500 vs 4400 mAh
  • Faster charging: 120W vs 25W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 197g vs 215g
  • Cheaper at launch: $450 vs $1999

  • Higher performance (93/100 vs 91/100)
  • Longer battery life (74/100 vs 39/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 78/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 vs the Vivo iQOO 15R, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 scores 2 points higher (75/100 vs 73/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads (76/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15R leads (74/100 vs 39/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 — 58/100, Vivo iQOO 15R — 70/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15R and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 are nearly equal (93/100 vs 91/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15R notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (94/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15R (76/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15R significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (74/100 vs 39/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 and the Vivo iQOO 15R are nearly equal (66/100 vs 62/100).

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7: The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Vivo iQOO 15R: The Vivo iQOO 15R is a better fit for gamers and power users.

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Vivo iQOO 15R
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 3065623 2817788
Geekbench Single 2910 3639
Geekbench Multi 9174 11047
Display 8.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2184x1968 2800x1260
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 4400 mAh 6500 mAh
Charging 25W 120W
Wireless charging 15W 0W
DXOMark (camera) 145 —
Main camera 200 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 8 MP
Telephoto 10 MP 0 MP
Front camera 10 MP 16 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 8GB / 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 16 / One UI 8 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 2600 nits 5000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP48 IP68
Dimensions 158.4×143.2×4.2 mm 157.6×74.4×7.9 mm
Weight 215 g 197 g
Launch price $1999 $450

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7

  • Main: 200MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
76
camera

Vivo iQOO 15R

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 16MP
35
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7

  • 8.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2184x1968
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
78
display

Vivo iQOO 15R

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2800x1260
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7

  • 4400 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
39
battery

Vivo iQOO 15R

  • 6500 mAh
  • Wired: 120W
  • No wireless charging
74
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 and Vivo iQOO 15R, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
75/100
3065623 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 15R Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
73/100 -8.8%
2817788 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads Vivo iQOO 15R by 8.8% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7

$1999

Vivo iQOO 15R

$450

Launch price difference: $1549. Vivo iQOO 15R was $1549 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15R and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 are nearly equal (93/100 vs 91/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15R notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (94/100 vs 78/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15R (76/100 vs 35/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15R significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (74/100 vs 39/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 and the Vivo iQOO 15R are nearly equal (66/100 vs 62/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 or the Vivo iQOO 15R?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 edges out the Vivo iQOO 15R by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 and the Vivo iQOO 15R?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 has a MobileRank rating of 75/100, the Vivo iQOO 15R — 73/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 or the Vivo iQOO 15R?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads on camera score (76/100 vs 35/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 over the Vivo iQOO 15R?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo iQOO 15R is a better fit for gamers and power users.