Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs Tecno Spark 30
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Tecno Spark 30 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Helio G91. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 57/100 vs 25/100 (a 32-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 64 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 358,383); the Tecno Spark 30 is thinner (7.7mm vs 12.9mm).
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Tecno Spark 30
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 358383
- Better Geekbench Single: 3050 vs 432
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9300 vs 1416
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 18W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (67/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (49/100 vs 35/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 36/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 50/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (50/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (55/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs the Tecno Spark 30, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 32 points higher (57/100 vs 25/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (67/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (49/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 36/100). In the "value for money" category, the Tecno Spark 30 leads (55/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 30 (67/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 30 (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (49/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Tecno Spark 30 (52/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the Tecno Spark 30 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (50/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Tecno Spark 30 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (55/100 vs 0/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | Tecno Spark 30 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Helio G91 | |
| AnTuTu | 2926532 | 358383 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3050 | 432 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9300 | 1416 | |
| Display | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.8" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 2160x1584 | 1080x2460 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 5600 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 18W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 13 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8 | Android 14, HIOS 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | 800 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | 168.0×76.4×7.7 mm | |
| Weight | 309 g | — | |
| Price | $2899 | — |
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Tecno Spark 30
- Main: 64MP
- Front: 13MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Spark 30
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2460
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Tecno Spark 30
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
We compared Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and Tecno Spark 30, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Tecno Spark 30 by 716.6% in our overall performance rating.
Tecno Spark 30
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 30 (67/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 30 (100/100 vs 50/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (49/100 vs 35/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Tecno Spark 30 (52/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Tecno Spark 30 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (50/100 vs 0/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Tecno Spark 30 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (55/100 vs 0/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Tecno Spark 30?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 30 by 32 points (57/100 vs 25/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Tecno Spark 30?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has a MobileRank rating of 57/100, the Tecno Spark 30 — 25/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Tecno Spark 30?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (49/100 vs 35/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Tecno Spark 30?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (67/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold over the Tecno Spark 30?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for active users. The Tecno Spark 30 is a better fit for everyday use.