Google Pixel 9 Pro XL vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (2024) runs on the Google Tensor G4, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $1099 and $2899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL leads — 74/100 vs 69/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 5060); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 1,672,795); the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL is noticeably lighter (221g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
What makes Google Pixel 9 Pro XL better?
- Faster wireless charging: 23W vs 15W
- Lighter: 221g vs 309g
- Cheaper at launch: $1099 vs $2899
- Better camera (88/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (86/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (41/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 1672795
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1900
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 5200
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 5060 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 37W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 74/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 57/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL scores 5 points higher (74/100 vs 69/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 74/100). In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL leads (88/100 vs 52/100). Value score: Google Pixel 9 Pro XL — 58/100, Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 46/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (90/100 vs 74/100). In the "display" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (86/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (88/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (63/100 vs 57/100). In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (41/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Google Pixel 9 Pro XL | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Google Tensor G4 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 1672795 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1900 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 5200 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.8" Super Actua LTPO OLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 2992x1344 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5060 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 37W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 23W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 160 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 48 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 48 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 42 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3000 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 162.8×76.6×8.5 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 221 g | 309 g | |
| Launch price | $1099 | $2899 |
Camera comparison
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
- Main: 50MP f/1.68
- Ultrawide: 48MP
- Telephoto: 48MP
- Front: 42MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
- 6.8" Super Actua LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 2992x1344
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
- 5060 mAh
- Wired: 37W
- Wireless: 23W
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Google Pixel 9 Pro XL and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Google Pixel 9 Pro XL by 42.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1800. Google Pixel 9 Pro XL was $1800 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (90/100 vs 74/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (86/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (88/100 vs 52/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (63/100 vs 57/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (41/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL edges out the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL has a MobileRank rating of 74/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL leads on camera score (88/100 vs 52/100).
Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 74/100).
Should you choose the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.