Google Pixel 9 Pro XL vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (2024) runs on the Google Tensor G4, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $1099 and $2899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 57/100 vs 53/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 5060); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 1,585,585); the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL is noticeably lighter (221g vs 309g).
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Faster wireless charging: 23W vs 15W
- Lighter: 221g vs 309g
- Cheaper: $1099 vs $2899
- Better camera (88/100 vs 49/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (23/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (34/100 vs 0/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 1585585
- Better Geekbench Single: 3050 vs 1900
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9300 vs 5200
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 5060 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 37W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (67/100 vs 26/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 46/100)
Comparing the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 4 points higher (57/100 vs 53/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (67/100 vs 26/100). In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL leads (88/100 vs 49/100). In the "value for money" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL leads (34/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (67/100 vs 26/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (88/100 vs 49/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 46/100). In the "design" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (23/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (34/100 vs 0/100).
| Specification | Google Pixel 9 Pro XL | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Google Tensor G4 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 1585585 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1900 | 3050 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 5200 | 9300 | |
| Display | 6.8" Super Actua LTPO OLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 2992x1344 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5060 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 37W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 23W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 160 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 48 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 48 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 42 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3000 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 162.8×76.6×8.5 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 221 g | 309 g | |
| Price | $1099 | $2899 |
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.68
- Ultrawide: 48MP
- Telephoto: 48MP
- Front: 42MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
- 6.8" Super Actua LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 2992x1344
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
- 5060 mAh
- Wired: 37W
- Wireless: 23W
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Google Pixel 9 Pro XL and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Google Pixel 9 Pro XL by 45.8% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $1800. Google Pixel 9 Pro XL is cheaper by $1800.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (67/100 vs 26/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (88/100 vs 49/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 46/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (23/100 vs 0/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (34/100 vs 0/100).
Which is better: the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold edges out the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL has a MobileRank rating of 53/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 57/100.
Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL leads on camera score (88/100 vs 49/100).
Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (67/100 vs 26/100).
Should you choose the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL is a better fit for mobile photography enthusiasts. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for active users.