Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide vs Vivo Y16
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Vivo Y16 (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P35. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads — 74/100 vs 30/100 (a 44-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y16 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4800); the main camera is 50 MP vs 13 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is faster in AnTuTu (3,950,082 vs 199,111); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y16 doesn't; the Vivo Y16 is noticeably lighter (184g vs 201g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
Vivo Y16
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3950082 vs 199111
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 476
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 828
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Higher performance (98/100 vs 19/100)
- Better camera (50/100 vs 10/100)
- Better display (80/100 vs 39/100)
- Better portability (74/100 vs 67/100)
What makes Vivo Y16 better?
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4800 mAh
- Lighter: 184g vs 201g
- Longer battery life (66/100 vs 52/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide vs the Vivo Y16, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide scores 44 points higher (74/100 vs 30/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads (98/100 vs 19/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads (50/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y16 leads (66/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Vivo Y16 (98/100 vs 19/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Vivo Y16 (80/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Vivo Y16 (50/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y16 is a bit better (66/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a bit better (74/100 vs 67/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide | Vivo Y16 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | MediaTek Helio P35 | |
| AnTuTu | 3950082 | 199111 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3639 | 476 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11047 | 828 | |
| Display | 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | 6.5" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | 1828x2448 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 3GB / 4GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 32GB / 64GB / 128GB | |
| OS | Android 17 / One UI 9 | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP48 | — | |
| Dimensions | 161.4×123.9×4.5 mm | 164.0×75.6×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 201 g | 184 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo Y16
- Main: 13MP f/2.2
- Front: 5MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 1828x2448
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo Y16
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: supported, wattage unknown
Vivo Y16
- 5000 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide and Vivo Y16, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads Vivo Y16 by 1883.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Vivo Y16 (98/100 vs 19/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Vivo Y16 (80/100 vs 39/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Vivo Y16 (50/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y16 is a bit better (66/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a bit better (74/100 vs 67/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide or the Vivo Y16?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Vivo Y16 by 44 points (74/100 vs 30/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide and the Vivo Y16?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide has a MobileRank rating of 74/100, the Vivo Y16 — 30/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide or the Vivo Y16?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads on camera score (50/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide or the Vivo Y16?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads on performance (98/100 vs 19/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide over the Vivo Y16?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a better fit for gamers and power users.