Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $1099 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 68/100 (a 23-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 2,362,730); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Ultra has the stronger camera (170 vs 129); the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 is noticeably lighter (187g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 better?
- Lighter: 187g vs 230g
- Better portability (78/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 2362730
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 2203
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 6511
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 25W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
- Cheaper at launch: $950 vs $1099
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 82/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 64/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 31/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 82/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 23 points higher (91/100 vs 68/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 31/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 — 46/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 (99/100 vs 82/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 (96/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 (85/100 vs 31/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (78/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 2362730 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2203 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6511 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 2640x1080 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 129 | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 165.1×71.9×6.9 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 187 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $1099 | $950 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6
- 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2640x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6
- 4000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 by 44.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $149. Vivo X300 Ultra was $149 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 (99/100 vs 82/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 82/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 (96/100 vs 64/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 (85/100 vs 31/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (78/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 by 23 points (91/100 vs 68/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 has a MobileRank rating of 68/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 64/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 82/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.