Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; estimated prices are $999 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 87/100 vs 45/100 (a 42-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 3700); the main camera is 12 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,743,099); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Ultra has the stronger camera (170 vs 127); the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 is noticeably lighter (187g vs 230g).
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Lighter: 187g vs 230g
- Better design/ergonomics (66/100 vs 12/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1743099
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 2004
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 5311
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 3700 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 25W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 12MP
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
- Cheaper: $950 vs $999
- Higher performance (96/100 vs 29/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 63/100)
- Longer battery life (77/100 vs 8/100)
- Better value for money (44/100 vs 41/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 42 points higher (87/100 vs 45/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 29/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 63/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (77/100 vs 8/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 (96/100 vs 29/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 (96/100 vs 63/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 (77/100 vs 8/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (66/100 vs 12/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 are nearly equal (44/100 vs 41/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1743099 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2004 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 5311 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 2640x1080 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 3700 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 127 | 170 | |
| Main camera | 12 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1750 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX8 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 165.1×71.9×6.9 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 187 g | 230 g | |
| Price | $999 | $950 |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
- Main: 12MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2640x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
- 3700 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 by 59.0% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $49. Vivo X300 Ultra is cheaper by $49.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 (96/100 vs 29/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 (96/100 vs 63/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 (77/100 vs 8/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (66/100 vs 12/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 are nearly equal (44/100 vs 41/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 by 42 points (87/100 vs 45/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 has a MobileRank rating of 45/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 63/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (96/100 vs 29/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life.