Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 vs Vivo X Fold6

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, while the Vivo X Fold6 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $999 and $1900. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X Fold6 leads — 88/100 vs 64/100 (a 24-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X Fold6 has the bigger battery (6900 mAh vs 3700); the main camera is 12 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X Fold6 is faster in AnTuTu (3,455,738 vs 1,746,199); the Vivo X Fold6 is thinner (4.3mm vs 6.9mm).

The Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 by 24 points (88/100 vs 64/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5

Performance 75
Display 82
Camera 63
Battery 24
Portability 78
Value for money 38

Vivo X Fold6

Performance 95
Display 81
Camera 87
Battery 82
Portability 100
Value for money 84

What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 better?

  • Cheaper at launch: $999 vs $1900

  • Better display (82/100 vs 81/100)

What makes Vivo X Fold6 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3455738 vs 1746199
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 2004
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 5311
  • Bigger battery: 6900 vs 3700 mAh
  • Faster charging: 80W vs 25W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 12MP
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W

  • Higher performance (95/100 vs 75/100)
  • Better camera (87/100 vs 63/100)
  • Longer battery life (82/100 vs 24/100)
  • Better portability (100/100 vs 78/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 vs the Vivo X Fold6, the Vivo X Fold6 scores 24 points higher (88/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (95/100 vs 75/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (87/100 vs 63/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (82/100 vs 24/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 — 38/100, Vivo X Fold6 — 84/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 (95/100 vs 75/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 and the Vivo X Fold6 are nearly equal (82/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 (87/100 vs 63/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 (82/100 vs 24/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold6 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 (100/100 vs 78/100).

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5: The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 is a better fit for active users.
Vivo X Fold6: The Vivo X Fold6 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 Vivo X Fold6
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 MediaTek Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 1746199 3455738
Geekbench Single 2004 3293
Geekbench Multi 5311 10243
Display 6.7" AMOLED 8.0" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2640x1080 2480x2200
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 3700 mAh 6900 mAh
Charging 25W 80W
Wireless charging 15W 50W
DXOMark (camera) 127 —
Main camera 12 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 10 MP 20 MP
RAM 8GB 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 512GB
OS Android 13 Android 15
Brightness (peak) 1750 nits 5500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IPX8 IP68
Dimensions 165.1×71.9×6.9 mm 159.7×142.3×4.3 mm
Weight 187 g —
Launch price $999 $1900

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5

  • Main: 12MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Front: 10MP
63
camera

Vivo X Fold6

  • Main: 200MP f/1.75
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 20MP
87
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5

  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2640x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
82
display

Vivo X Fold6

  • 8.0" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2480x2200
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5

  • 3700 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
24
battery

Vivo X Fold6

  • 6900 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • Wireless: 50W
82
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 and Vivo X Fold6, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
64/100
1746199 AnTuTu
Vivo X Fold6 MediaTek Dimensity 9500
88/100 +49.5%
3455738 AnTuTu

Vivo X Fold6 leads Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 by 49.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5

$999

Vivo X Fold6

$1900

Launch price difference: $901. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 was $901 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 (95/100 vs 75/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 and the Vivo X Fold6 are nearly equal (82/100 vs 81/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 (87/100 vs 63/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 (82/100 vs 24/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold6 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 (100/100 vs 78/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 or the Vivo X Fold6?

The Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 by 24 points (88/100 vs 64/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 and the Vivo X Fold6?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 has a MobileRank rating of 64/100, the Vivo X Fold6 — 88/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 or the Vivo X Fold6?

The Vivo X Fold6 leads on camera score (87/100 vs 63/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 or the Vivo X Fold6?

The Vivo X Fold6 leads on performance (95/100 vs 75/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 over the Vivo X Fold6?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X Fold6 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.