Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 vs Vivo X300s

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, while the Vivo X300s (2026) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $999 and $723. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300s leads — 89/100 vs 60/100 (a 29-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300s has the bigger battery (7100 mAh vs 3700); the main camera is 12 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300s is faster in AnTuTu (3,703,823 vs 1,399,664); the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 is noticeably lighter (187g vs 217g).

The Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 by 29 points (89/100 vs 60/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4

Performance 71
Display 82
Camera 51
Battery 24
Portability 78
Value for money 30

Vivo X300s

Performance 95
Display 94
Camera 94
Battery 83
Portability 42
Value for money 92

What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 better?

  • Lighter: 187g vs 217g

  • Better portability (78/100 vs 42/100)

What makes Vivo X300s better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3703823 vs 1399664
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1761
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 4688
  • Bigger battery: 7100 vs 3700 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 25W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 12MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
  • Cheaper at launch: $723 vs $999

  • Higher performance (95/100 vs 71/100)
  • Better camera (94/100 vs 51/100)
  • Longer battery life (83/100 vs 24/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 82/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 vs the Vivo X300s, the Vivo X300s scores 29 points higher (89/100 vs 60/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s leads (95/100 vs 71/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s leads (94/100 vs 51/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s leads (83/100 vs 24/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 — 30/100, Vivo X300s — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 (95/100 vs 71/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s is a bit better (94/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 (94/100 vs 51/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 (83/100 vs 24/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300s (78/100 vs 42/100).

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4: The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 is a better fit for active users.
Vivo X300s: The Vivo X300s is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 Vivo X300s
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 1399664 3703823
Geekbench Single 1761 3293
Geekbench Multi 4688 10243
Display 6.7" AMOLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2640x1080 2800x1260
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 3700 mAh 7100 mAh
Charging 25W 90W
Wireless charging 15W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 112 —
Main camera 12 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 10 MP 50 MP
RAM 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 12 Android 16 / OriginOS 6
Brightness (peak) 1200 nits —
NFC yes —
Protection IPX8 —
Dimensions 165.2×71.9×6.9 mm —
Weight 187 g 217 g
Launch price $999 $723

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4

  • Main: 12MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Front: 10MP
51
camera

Vivo X300s

  • Main: 200MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
94
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4

  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2640x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
82
display

Vivo X300s

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2800x1260
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4

  • 3700 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
24
battery

Vivo X300s

  • 7100 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
83
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 and Vivo X300s, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
60/100
1399664 AnTuTu
Vivo X300s Dimensity 9500
89/100 +62.2%
3703823 AnTuTu

Vivo X300s leads Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 by 62.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4

$999

Vivo X300s

$723

Launch price difference: $276. Vivo X300s was $276 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 (95/100 vs 71/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s is a bit better (94/100 vs 82/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 (94/100 vs 51/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 (83/100 vs 24/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300s (78/100 vs 42/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 or the Vivo X300s?

The Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 by 29 points (89/100 vs 60/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 and the Vivo X300s?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 has a MobileRank rating of 60/100, the Vivo X300s — 89/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 or the Vivo X300s?

The Vivo X300s leads on camera score (94/100 vs 51/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 or the Vivo X300s?

The Vivo X300s leads on performance (95/100 vs 71/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 over the Vivo X300s?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300s is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.