Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 vs Vivo iQOO 15T

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, while the Vivo iQOO 15T (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $999 and $499. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15T leads — 82/100 vs 60/100 (a 22-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15T has the bigger battery (8000 mAh vs 3700); the main camera is 12 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo iQOO 15T is faster in AnTuTu (4,704,310 vs 1,399,664); the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 is noticeably lighter (187g vs 216g).

The Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 by 22 points (82/100 vs 60/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4

Performance 71
Display 82
Camera 51
Battery 24
Portability 78
Value for money 30

Vivo iQOO 15T

Performance 97
Display 99
Camera 65
Battery 75
Portability 44
Value for money 86

What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 better?

  • Lighter: 187g vs 216g

  • Better portability (78/100 vs 44/100)

What makes Vivo iQOO 15T better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 4704310 vs 1399664
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1761
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 4688
  • Bigger battery: 8000 vs 3700 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 25W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 12MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Cheaper at launch: $499 vs $999

  • Higher performance (97/100 vs 71/100)
  • Better camera (65/100 vs 51/100)
  • Longer battery life (75/100 vs 24/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 82/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 vs the Vivo iQOO 15T, the Vivo iQOO 15T scores 22 points higher (82/100 vs 60/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T leads (97/100 vs 71/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T leads (65/100 vs 51/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T leads (75/100 vs 24/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 — 30/100, Vivo iQOO 15T — 86/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 (97/100 vs 71/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 (99/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T is a bit better (65/100 vs 51/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 (75/100 vs 24/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15T (78/100 vs 44/100).

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4: The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 is a better fit for active users.
Vivo iQOO 15T: The Vivo iQOO 15T is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 Vivo iQOO 15T
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 MediaTek Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 1399664 4704310
Geekbench Single 1761 3293
Geekbench Multi 4688 10243
Display 6.7" AMOLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2640x1080 1440x3168
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 3700 mAh 8000 mAh
Charging 25W 100W
Wireless charging 15W 0W
DXOMark (camera) 112 —
Main camera 12 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 50 MP
Front camera 10 MP 16 MP
RAM 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 12 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 1200 nits —
NFC yes yes
Protection IPX8 IP68
Dimensions 165.2×71.9×6.9 mm —
Weight 187 g 216 g
Launch price $999 $499

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4

  • Main: 12MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Front: 10MP
51
camera

Vivo iQOO 15T

  • Main: 200MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 16MP
65
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4

  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2640x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
82
display

Vivo iQOO 15T

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4

  • 3700 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
24
battery

Vivo iQOO 15T

  • 8000 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • No wireless charging
75
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 and Vivo iQOO 15T, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
60/100
1399664 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 15T MediaTek Dimensity 9500
82/100 +70.2%
4704310 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 15T leads Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 by 70.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4

$999

Vivo iQOO 15T

$499

Launch price difference: $500. Vivo iQOO 15T was $500 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 (97/100 vs 71/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 (99/100 vs 82/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T is a bit better (65/100 vs 51/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 (75/100 vs 24/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15T (78/100 vs 44/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 or the Vivo iQOO 15T?

The Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 by 22 points (82/100 vs 60/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 and the Vivo iQOO 15T?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 has a MobileRank rating of 60/100, the Vivo iQOO 15T — 82/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 or the Vivo iQOO 15T?

The Vivo iQOO 15T leads on camera score (65/100 vs 51/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 or the Vivo iQOO 15T?

The Vivo iQOO 15T leads on performance (97/100 vs 71/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 over the Vivo iQOO 15T?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 is a better fit for active users. The Vivo iQOO 15T is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.