Samsung Galaxy Xcover6 Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The Samsung Galaxy Xcover6 Pro (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 43/100 (a 48-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4050); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 781,542); the Vivo X300 Ultra is thinner (8.2mm vs 9.9mm).

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Xcover6 Pro by 48 points (91/100 vs 43/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy Xcover6 Pro
Performance 54
Display 66
Camera 34
Battery 23
Portability 22
Value for money
Vivo X300 Ultra
Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94
What makes Samsung Galaxy Xcover6 Pro better?

  • Overall rating 43/100
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 781542
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1017
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 2943
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4050 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 15W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Lighter: 230g vs 235g

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 54/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 34/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 23/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 66/100)
  • Better portability (39/100 vs 22/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Xcover6 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 48 points higher (91/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 54/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 23/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Xcover6 Pro (99/100 vs 54/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Xcover6 Pro (89/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Xcover6 Pro (96/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Xcover6 Pro (85/100 vs 23/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Xcover6 Pro (39/100 vs 22/100).

Samsung Galaxy Xcover6 Pro: The Samsung Galaxy Xcover6 Pro is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy Xcover6 Pro Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 781542 4247433
Geekbench Single 1017 3640
Geekbench Multi 2943 11033
Display 6.6" PLS LCD 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 1080x2408 3168x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4050 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 15W 100W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 170
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 13 MP 32 MP
RAM 6GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 12, One UI 4.1 Android 16
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP69
Dimensions 168.8×79.9×9.9 mm 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 235 g 230 g
Launch price $950
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy Xcover6 Pro
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 13MP
34
camera
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy Xcover6 Pro
  • 6.6" PLS LCD
  • Resolution: 1080x2408
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
66
display
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy Xcover6 Pro
  • 4050 mAh
  • Wired: 15W
  • No wireless charging
23
battery
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy Xcover6 Pro and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy Xcover6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
43/100
781542 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100 +81.6%
4247433 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy Xcover6 Pro by 81.6% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy Xcover6 Pro
Price unknown
Vivo X300 Ultra
$950
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Xcover6 Pro (99/100 vs 54/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Xcover6 Pro (89/100 vs 66/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Xcover6 Pro (96/100 vs 34/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Xcover6 Pro (85/100 vs 23/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Xcover6 Pro (39/100 vs 22/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Xcover6 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Xcover6 Pro by 48 points (91/100 vs 43/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Xcover6 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy Xcover6 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 43/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Xcover6 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 34/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Xcover6 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 54/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Xcover6 Pro over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy Xcover6 Pro is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.