Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro 2 vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro 2 (2022) runs on the Exynos 1280, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 38/100 (a 53-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 25 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 613,957); the Vivo X300 Ultra is thinner (8.2mm vs 10.1mm).

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro 2 by 53 points (91/100 vs 38/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro 2
Performance 47
Display 57
Camera 21
Battery 34
Portability 20
Value for money
Vivo X300 Ultra
Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 86
What makes Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro 2 better?

  • Overall rating 38/100
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 613957
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 957
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 2095
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4500 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 25W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 25MP

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 47/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 21/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 34/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 57/100)
  • Better portability (39/100 vs 20/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro 2 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 53 points higher (91/100 vs 38/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 47/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 21/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 34/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro 2 (99/100 vs 47/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro 2 (89/100 vs 57/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro 2 (96/100 vs 21/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro 2 (85/100 vs 34/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro 2 (39/100 vs 20/100).

Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro 2: The Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro 2 is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro 2 Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor Exynos 1280 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 613957 4247433
Geekbench Single 957 3640
Geekbench Multi 2095 11033
Display 6.6" IPS LCD 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 1080x2400 3168x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz
Battery 4500 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 25W 100W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 170
Main camera 25 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 13 MP 32 MP
RAM 4GB / 6GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 64GB / 128GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 12, One UI 4.1 Android 16
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP69
Dimensions 169.5×81.1×10.1 mm 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 230 g
Price $10498
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro 2
  • Main: 25MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 13MP
21
camera
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro 2
  • 6.6" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: —
57
display
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro 2
  • 4500 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • No wireless charging
34
battery
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro 2 and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro 2 Exynos 1280
38/100
613957 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100 +85.5%
4247433 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro 2 by 85.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro 2
Price unknown
Vivo X300 Ultra
$10498
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro 2 (99/100 vs 47/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro 2 (89/100 vs 57/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro 2 (96/100 vs 21/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro 2 (85/100 vs 34/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro 2 (39/100 vs 20/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro 2 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro 2 by 53 points (91/100 vs 38/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro 2 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro 2 has a MobileRank rating of 38/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro 2 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 21/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro 2 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 47/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro 2 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro 2 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.