Samsung Galaxy S9+ vs Vivo X Fold6

The Samsung Galaxy S9+ (2018) runs on the Samsung Exynos 9810, while the Vivo X Fold6 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $840 and $1900. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X Fold6 leads — 88/100 vs 36/100 (a 52-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X Fold6 has the bigger battery (6900 mAh vs 3500); the main camera is 12 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X Fold6 is faster in AnTuTu (3,485,039 vs 583,956); the Vivo X Fold6 is thinner (4.3mm vs 8.5mm).

The Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S9+ by 52 points (88/100 vs 36/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy S9+
Performance 44
Display 66
Camera 15
Battery 19
Portability 60
Value for money 0
Vivo X Fold6
Performance 94
Display 81
Camera 87
Battery 82
Portability 100
Value for money 80
What makes Samsung Galaxy S9+ better?
  • Cheaper at launch: $840 vs $1900

  • Overall rating 36/100
What makes Vivo X Fold6 better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3485039 vs 583956
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 769
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 2000
  • Bigger battery: 6900 vs 3500 mAh
  • Faster charging: 80W vs 15W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 12MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 10W

  • Higher performance (94/100 vs 44/100)
  • Better camera (87/100 vs 15/100)
  • Longer battery life (82/100 vs 19/100)
  • Better display (81/100 vs 66/100)
  • Better portability (100/100 vs 60/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S9+ vs the Vivo X Fold6, the Vivo X Fold6 scores 52 points higher (88/100 vs 36/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (94/100 vs 44/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (87/100 vs 15/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (82/100 vs 19/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy S9+ — 0/100, Vivo X Fold6 — 80/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S9+ (94/100 vs 44/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X Fold6 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S9+ (81/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S9+ (87/100 vs 15/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S9+ (82/100 vs 19/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S9+ (100/100 vs 60/100).

Samsung Galaxy S9+: The Samsung Galaxy S9+ is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo X Fold6: The Vivo X Fold6 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy S9+ Vivo X Fold6
Processor Samsung Exynos 9810 MediaTek Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 583956 3485039
Geekbench Single 769 3228
Geekbench Multi 2000 9553
Display 6.2" Super AMOLED 8.0" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2960x1440 2480x2200
Refresh rate 60 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 3500 mAh 6900 mAh
Charging 15W 80W
Wireless charging 10W 50W
Main camera 12 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 12 MP 50 MP
Front camera 8 MP 20 MP
RAM 6GB 16GB
Storage 64GB / 128GB / 256GB 512GB
OS Android 8.0 Android 15
Brightness (peak) 5500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 158.1×73.8×8.5 mm 159.7×142.3×4.3 mm
Weight 189 g
Launch price $840 $1900
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy S9+
  • Main: 12MP f/1.5
  • Telephoto: 12MP
  • Front: 8MP
15
camera
Vivo X Fold6
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.75
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 20MP
87
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy S9+
  • 6.2" Super AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2960x1440
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
66
display
Vivo X Fold6
  • 8.0" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2480x2200
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy S9+
  • 3500 mAh
  • Wired: 15W
  • Wireless: 10W
19
battery
Vivo X Fold6
  • 6900 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • Wireless: 50W
82
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy S9+ and Vivo X Fold6, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy S9+ Samsung Exynos 9810
36/100
583956 AnTuTu
Vivo X Fold6 MediaTek Dimensity 9500
88/100 +83.2%
3485039 AnTuTu

Vivo X Fold6 leads Samsung Galaxy S9+ by 83.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy S9+
$840
Vivo X Fold6
$1900

Launch price difference: $1060. Samsung Galaxy S9+ was $1060 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S9+ (94/100 vs 44/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X Fold6 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S9+ (81/100 vs 66/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S9+ (87/100 vs 15/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S9+ (82/100 vs 19/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S9+ (100/100 vs 60/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S9+ or the Vivo X Fold6?

The Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S9+ by 52 points (88/100 vs 36/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S9+ and the Vivo X Fold6?

The Samsung Galaxy S9+ has a MobileRank rating of 36/100, the Vivo X Fold6 — 88/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S9+ or the Vivo X Fold6?

The Vivo X Fold6 leads on camera score (87/100 vs 15/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S9+ or the Vivo X Fold6?

The Vivo X Fold6 leads on performance (94/100 vs 44/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S9+ over the Vivo X Fold6?

The Samsung Galaxy S9+ is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X Fold6 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.