Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge vs Vivo X300 Pro

The Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge (2016) runs on the Samsung Exynos 8890, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $790 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 28/100 (a 59-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 3600); the main camera is 12 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 413,736); the Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge is noticeably lighter (157g vs 226g).

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge by 59 points (87/100 vs 28/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Performance 29
Display 51
Camera 10
Battery 17
Portability 87
Value for money 0
Vivo X300 Pro
Performance 93
Display 84
Camera 96
Battery 81
Portability 43
Value for money 86
What makes Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge better?
  • Lighter: 157g vs 226g
  • Cheaper at launch: $790 vs $899

  • Better portability (87/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 413736
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 413
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 1102
  • Bigger battery: 6510 vs 3600 mAh
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 12MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz

  • Higher performance (93/100 vs 29/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 10/100)
  • Longer battery life (81/100 vs 17/100)
  • Better display (84/100 vs 51/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 59 points higher (87/100 vs 28/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 29/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 17/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge — 0/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 86/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge (93/100 vs 29/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge (84/100 vs 51/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge (81/100 vs 17/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (87/100 vs 43/100).

Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge: The Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo X300 Pro: The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Vivo X300 Pro
Processor Samsung Exynos 8890 Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 413736 3269794
Geekbench Single 413 3228
Geekbench Multi 1102 9553
Display 5.5" AMOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 1260x2800
Refresh rate 60 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 3600 mAh 6510 mAh
Charging 90W
Wireless charging 40W
DXOMark (camera) 171
Main camera 12 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 5 MP 32 MP
RAM 4GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 32GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 150.9×72.6×7.7 mm 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm
Weight 157 g 226 g
Launch price $790 $899
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
  • Main: 12MP
  • Front: 5MP
10
camera
Vivo X300 Pro
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
  • 5.5" AMOLED
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
51
display
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
  • 3600 mAh
  • Wireless: supported, wattage unknown
17
battery
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6510 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
81
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Samsung Exynos 8890
28/100
413736 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Pro Dimensity 9500
87/100 +87.3%
3269794 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge by 87.3% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
$790
Vivo X300 Pro
$899

Launch price difference: $109. Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge was $109 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge (93/100 vs 29/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge (84/100 vs 51/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge (96/100 vs 10/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge (81/100 vs 17/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (87/100 vs 43/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge by 59 points (87/100 vs 28/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge and the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge has a MobileRank rating of 28/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 10/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 29/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge over the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.