Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Tecno Spark 50 4G
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Tecno Spark 50 4G (2026) runs on the Helio G81; launch prices were $1299 and $139. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads — 83/100 vs 39/100 (a 44-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Spark 50 4G has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,437,807 vs 358,383).
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
Tecno Spark 50 4G
- Higher AnTuTu: 3437807 vs 358383
- Better Geekbench Single: 3601 vs 432
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10686 vs 1416
- Faster charging: 60W vs 18W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (95/100 vs 30/100)
- Better camera (86/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (61/100 vs 55/100)
- Better display (88/100 vs 55/100)
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
- Lighter: 210g vs 214g
- Cheaper at launch: $139 vs $1299
- Overall rating 39/100
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs the Tecno Spark 50 4G, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra scores 44 points higher (83/100 vs 39/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (95/100 vs 30/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (86/100 vs 30/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra — 74/100, Tecno Spark 50 4G — 56/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 50 4G (95/100 vs 30/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 50 4G (88/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 50 4G (86/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a bit better (61/100 vs 55/100). In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 51/100.
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra | Tecno Spark 50 4G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Helio G81 | |
| AnTuTu | 3437807 | 358383 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3601 | 432 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 10686 | 1416 | |
| Display | 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.8" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 3120x1440 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 60W | 18W | |
| Wireless charging | 25W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 157 | — | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8.5 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 163.6×78.1×7.9 mm | 167.8×79.2×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 214 g | 210 g | |
| Launch price | $1299 | $139 |
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 12MP
Tecno Spark 50 4G
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 3120x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Spark 50 4G
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:12 hrs, total 28:50 hrs
- Wired: 60W
- Wireless: 25W
Tecno Spark 50 4G
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
We compared Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and Tecno Spark 50 4G, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads Tecno Spark 50 4G by 859.3% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $1160. Tecno Spark 50 4G was $1160 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 50 4G (95/100 vs 30/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 50 4G (88/100 vs 55/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 50 4G (86/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a bit better (61/100 vs 55/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 51/100.
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra or the Tecno Spark 50 4G?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 50 4G by 44 points (83/100 vs 39/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and the Tecno Spark 50 4G?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the Tecno Spark 50 4G — 39/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra or the Tecno Spark 50 4G?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads on camera score (86/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra or the Tecno Spark 50 4G?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads on performance (95/100 vs 30/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra over the Tecno Spark 50 4G?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Tecno Spark 50 4G is a better fit for everyday use.