Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Tecno Pova 7 5G
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Tecno Pova 7 5G (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6300; launch prices were $1299 and $200. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads — 84/100 vs 54/100 (a 30-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Pova 7 5G has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 108 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,463,142 vs 825,080).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
Tecno Pova 7 5G
What makes Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3463142 vs 825080
- Better Geekbench Single: 3601 vs 771
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10686 vs 1980
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 108MP
- Higher performance (96/100 vs 49/100)
- Better camera (86/100 vs 39/100)
- Better display (88/100 vs 66/100)
What makes Tecno Pova 7 5G better?
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
- Lighter: 205g vs 214g
- Cheaper at launch: $200 vs $1299
- Longer battery life (79/100 vs 61/100)
- Better portability (54/100 vs 51/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs the Tecno Pova 7 5G, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra scores 30 points higher (84/100 vs 54/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 49/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (86/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova 7 5G leads (79/100 vs 61/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra — 78/100, Tecno Pova 7 5G — 68/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 5G (96/100 vs 49/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 5G (88/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 5G (86/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova 7 5G notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (79/100 vs 61/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova 7 5G and the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra are nearly equal (54/100 vs 51/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra | Tecno Pova 7 5G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 | |
| AnTuTu | 3463142 | 825080 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3601 | 771 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 10686 | 1980 | |
| Display | 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.8" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 3120x1440 | — | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 60W | — | |
| Wireless charging | 25W | — | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 157 | — | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 108 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8.5 | — | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | — | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 163.6×78.1×7.9 mm | — | |
| Weight | 214 g | 205 g | |
| Launch price | $1299 | $200 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 12MP
Tecno Pova 7 5G
- Main: 108MP
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 3120x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Pova 7 5G
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:12 hrs, total 28:50 hrs
- Wired: 60W
- Wireless: 25W
Tecno Pova 7 5G
- 6000 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and Tecno Pova 7 5G, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads Tecno Pova 7 5G by 319.7% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1099. Tecno Pova 7 5G was $1099 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 5G (96/100 vs 49/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 5G (88/100 vs 66/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 5G (86/100 vs 39/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova 7 5G notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (79/100 vs 61/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova 7 5G and the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra are nearly equal (54/100 vs 51/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra or the Tecno Pova 7 5G?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 5G by 30 points (84/100 vs 54/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and the Tecno Pova 7 5G?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 84/100, the Tecno Pova 7 5G — 54/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra or the Tecno Pova 7 5G?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads on camera score (86/100 vs 39/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra or the Tecno Pova 7 5G?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads on performance (96/100 vs 49/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra over the Tecno Pova 7 5G?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers. The Tecno Pova 7 5G is a better fit for those who care about battery life.