Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Tecno Pova 7 5G

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Tecno Pova 7 5G (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6300; estimated prices are $1230 and $200. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads — 84/100 vs 54/100 (a 30-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Pova 7 5G has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 108 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,515,964 vs 854,047).

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 5G by 30 points (84/100 vs 54/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
Performance 96
Display 88
Camera 86
Battery 61
Portability 51
Value for money 78
Tecno Pova 7 5G
Performance 49
Display 66
Camera 39
Battery 79
Portability 54
Value for money
What makes Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3515964 vs 854047
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3601 vs 771
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10686 vs 1980
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 108MP

  • Higher performance (96/100 vs 49/100)
  • Better camera (86/100 vs 39/100)
  • Better display (88/100 vs 66/100)
What makes Tecno Pova 7 5G better?
  • Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
  • Lighter: 205g vs 214g
  • Cheaper: $200 vs $1230

  • Longer battery life (79/100 vs 61/100)
  • Better portability (54/100 vs 51/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs the Tecno Pova 7 5G, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra scores 30 points higher (84/100 vs 54/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 49/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (86/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova 7 5G leads (79/100 vs 61/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 5G (96/100 vs 49/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 5G (88/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 5G (86/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova 7 5G notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (79/100 vs 61/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova 7 5G and the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra are nearly equal (54/100 vs 51/100).

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra: The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers.
Tecno Pova 7 5G: The Tecno Pova 7 5G is a better fit for those who care about battery life.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Tecno Pova 7 5G
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 MediaTek Dimensity 6300
AnTuTu 3515964 854047
Geekbench Single 3601 771
Geekbench Multi 10686 1980
Display 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X 6.8" IPS LCD
Resolution 3120x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 6000 mAh
Charging 60W
Wireless charging 25W
DXOMark (camera) 157
Main camera 200 MP 108 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 0 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 0 MP
Front camera 12 MP 8 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 6GB / 8GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 16 / One UI 8.5
Brightness (peak) 2600 nits
NFC yes
Protection IP68
Dimensions 163.6×78.1×7.9 mm
Weight 214 g 205 g
Price $1230 $200
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 12MP
86
camera
Tecno Pova 7 5G
  • Main: 108MP
  • Front: 8MP
39
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
  • 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 3120x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
88
display
Tecno Pova 7 5G
  • 6.8" IPS LCD
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
66
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
  • 5000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:12 hrs, total 28:50 hrs
  • Wired: 60W
  • Wireless: 25W
61
battery
Tecno Pova 7 5G
  • 6000 mAh
  • Wireless charging: no data
79
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and Tecno Pova 7 5G, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
84/100
3515964 AnTuTu
Tecno Pova 7 5G MediaTek Dimensity 6300
54/100 -311.7%
854047 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads Tecno Pova 7 5G by 311.7% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
$1230
Tecno Pova 7 5G
$200

Price difference: $1030. Tecno Pova 7 5G is cheaper by $1030.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 5G (96/100 vs 49/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 5G (88/100 vs 66/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 5G (86/100 vs 39/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova 7 5G notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (79/100 vs 61/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova 7 5G and the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra are nearly equal (54/100 vs 51/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra or the Tecno Pova 7 5G?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 5G by 30 points (84/100 vs 54/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and the Tecno Pova 7 5G?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 84/100, the Tecno Pova 7 5G — 54/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra or the Tecno Pova 7 5G?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads on camera score (86/100 vs 39/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra or the Tecno Pova 7 5G?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads on performance (96/100 vs 49/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra over the Tecno Pova 7 5G?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers. The Tecno Pova 7 5G is a better fit for those who care about battery life.