Samsung Galaxy S26+ vs Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
The Samsung Galaxy S26+ (2026) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2600, while the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate; launch prices were $999 and $249. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ leads — 70/100 vs 63/100 (a 7-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 4900); the Samsung Galaxy S26+ is faster in AnTuTu (3,161,830 vs 1,030,590).
Samsung Galaxy S26+
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- Higher AnTuTu: 3161830 vs 1030590
- Better Geekbench Single: 2900 vs 1061
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9200 vs 3185
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 58/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 82/100)
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 4900 mAh
- Lighter: 178g vs 190g
- Cheaper at launch: $249 vs $999
- Better camera (61/100 vs 40/100)
- Longer battery life (58/100 vs 54/100)
- Better portability (74/100 vs 72/100)
- Higher value score: 80/100 vs 52/100
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S26+ vs the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ scores 7 points higher (70/100 vs 63/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ leads (91/100 vs 58/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra leads (61/100 vs 40/100). In the "value for money" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra leads (80/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (91/100 vs 58/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ is a bit better (89/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26+ (61/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy S26+ are nearly equal (58/100 vs 54/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy S26+ are nearly equal (74/100 vs 72/100). In the "value for money" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26+ (80/100 vs 52/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy S26+ | Tecno Camon 50 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 2600 | MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate | |
| AnTuTu | 3161830 | 1030590 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2900 | 1061 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9200 | 3185 | |
| Display | 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 3120x1440 | 1208x2644 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4900 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8.5 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 158.4×75.8×7.3 mm | 162.4×77.0×7.8 mm | |
| Weight | 190 g | 178 g | |
| Launch price | $999 | $249 |
Samsung Galaxy S26+
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 12MP
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy S26+
- 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 3120x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1208x2644
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S26+
- 4900 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
We compared Samsung Galaxy S26+ and Tecno Camon 50 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy S26+ leads Tecno Camon 50 Ultra by 206.8% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $750. Tecno Camon 50 Ultra was $750 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (91/100 vs 58/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ is a bit better (89/100 vs 82/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26+ (61/100 vs 40/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy S26+ are nearly equal (58/100 vs 54/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy S26+ are nearly equal (74/100 vs 72/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26+ (80/100 vs 52/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S26+ or the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S26+ edges out the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S26+ and the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S26+ has a MobileRank rating of 70/100, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra — 63/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S26+ or the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?
The Tecno Camon 50 Ultra leads on camera score (61/100 vs 40/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S26+ or the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S26+ leads on performance (91/100 vs 58/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S26+ over the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S26+ is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Tecno Camon 50 Ultra is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.