Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 vs Tecno Camon 50 Ultra

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate; launch prices were $1999 and $249. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 leads — 72/100 vs 63/100 (a 9-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 4800); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 1,030,590); the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra is noticeably lighter (178g vs 215g).

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 edges out the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8
Performance 98
Display 79
Camera 50
Battery 52
Portability 44
Value for money 48
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
Performance 58
Display 82
Camera 61
Battery 58
Portability 74
Value for money 80
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 1030590
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1061
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 3185

  • Higher performance (98/100 vs 58/100)
What makes Tecno Camon 50 Ultra better?
  • Bigger battery: 6500 vs 4800 mAh
  • Lighter: 178g vs 215g
  • Cheaper at launch: $249 vs $1999

  • Better camera (61/100 vs 50/100)
  • Longer battery life (58/100 vs 52/100)
  • Better display (82/100 vs 79/100)
  • Better portability (74/100 vs 44/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 vs the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 scores 9 points higher (72/100 vs 63/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 leads (98/100 vs 58/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra leads (61/100 vs 50/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 — 48/100, Tecno Camon 50 Ultra — 80/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (98/100 vs 58/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 are nearly equal (82/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra is a bit better (61/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra is a bit better (58/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 (74/100 vs 44/100).

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8: The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra: The Tecno Camon 50 Ultra is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
Processor Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate
AnTuTu 3942923 1030590
Geekbench Single 3640 1061
Geekbench Multi 11033 3185
Display 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 1968x2184 1208x2644
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4800 mAh 6500 mAh
Charging 45W 45W
Wireless charging 15W 0W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 8 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 10 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 8GB / 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 16 / One UI 8.5 Android 16
NFC yes yes
Protection IP48 IP68
Dimensions 162.4×77.0×7.8 mm
Weight 215 g 178 g
Launch price $1999 $249
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 10MP
50
camera
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
61
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8
  • 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 1968x2184
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1208x2644
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
82
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8
  • 4800 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless: 15W
52
battery
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
  • 6500 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • No wireless charging
58
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 and Tecno Camon 50 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
72/100
3942923 AnTuTu
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate
63/100 -282.6%
1030590 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 leads Tecno Camon 50 Ultra by 282.6% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8
$1999
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
$249

Launch price difference: $1750. Tecno Camon 50 Ultra was $1750 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (98/100 vs 58/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 are nearly equal (82/100 vs 79/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra is a bit better (61/100 vs 50/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra is a bit better (58/100 vs 52/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 (74/100 vs 44/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 or the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 edges out the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 and the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 has a MobileRank rating of 72/100, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra — 63/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 or the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?

The Tecno Camon 50 Ultra leads on camera score (61/100 vs 50/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 or the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 leads on performance (98/100 vs 58/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 over the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Tecno Camon 50 Ultra is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.