Samsung Galaxy S25 vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Samsung Galaxy S25 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $799 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 66/100 (a 21-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 2,615,773); the Samsung Galaxy S25 is noticeably lighter (162g vs 226g).
Samsung Galaxy S25
Vivo X300 Pro
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9600 vs 9553
- Lighter: 162g vs 226g
- Cheaper at launch: $799 vs $899
- Better portability (89/100 vs 43/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 2615773
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 3050
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 4000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 25W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 90/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 40/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 31/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 81/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S25 vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 21 points higher (87/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 31/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy S25 — 44/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 86/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy S25 are nearly equal (93/100 vs 90/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy S25 are nearly equal (84/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 (96/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 (81/100 vs 31/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (89/100 vs 43/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy S25 | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 2615773 | 3269794 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3050 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9600 | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.2" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2340x1080 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 / One UI 7 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 158.4×75.8×7.3 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 162 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | $799 | $899 |
Samsung Galaxy S25
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 12MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy S25
- 6.2" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2340x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S25
- 4000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Samsung Galaxy S25 and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy S25 by 20.0% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $100. Samsung Galaxy S25 was $100 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy S25 are nearly equal (93/100 vs 90/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy S25 are nearly equal (84/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 (96/100 vs 40/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 (81/100 vs 31/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (89/100 vs 43/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S25 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 by 21 points (87/100 vs 66/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S25 and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 has a MobileRank rating of 66/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S25 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 40/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S25 over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.