Samsung Galaxy S25 FE vs Vivo X500 Pro

The Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (2025) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2400, while the Vivo X500 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro; launch prices were $599 and $970. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X500 Pro leads — 90/100 vs 68/100 (a 22-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X500 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 4700); the Vivo X500 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (5,016,623 vs 2,087,886).

The Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE by 22 points (90/100 vs 68/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE

Performance 80
Display 79
Camera 56
Battery 50
Portability 71
Value for money 50

Vivo X500 Pro

Performance 100
Display 94
Camera 87
Battery 81
Portability 63
Value for money 92

What makes Samsung Galaxy S25 FE better?

  • Lighter: 190g vs 192g
  • Cheaper at launch: $599 vs $970

  • Better portability (71/100 vs 63/100)

What makes Vivo X500 Pro better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 5016623 vs 2087886
  • Better Geekbench Single: 4188 vs 2115
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 13145 vs 6826
  • Bigger battery: 6510 vs 4700 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W

  • Higher performance (100/100 vs 80/100)
  • Better camera (87/100 vs 56/100)
  • Longer battery life (81/100 vs 50/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 79/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE vs the Vivo X500 Pro, the Vivo X500 Pro scores 22 points higher (90/100 vs 68/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 Pro leads (100/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 Pro leads (87/100 vs 56/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 Pro leads (81/100 vs 50/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy S25 FE — 50/100, Vivo X500 Pro — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (100/100 vs 80/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X500 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (94/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (87/100 vs 56/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (81/100 vs 50/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE is a bit better (71/100 vs 63/100).

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE: The Samsung Galaxy S25 FE is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Vivo X500 Pro: The Vivo X500 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Vivo X500 Pro
Processor Samsung Exynos 2400 MediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro
AnTuTu 2087886 5016623
Geekbench Single 2115 4188
Geekbench Multi 6826 13145
Display 6.7" AMOLED 6.4" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2340 1216x2660
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 4700 mAh 6510 mAh
Charging 45W 90W
Wireless charging 15W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 118 —
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 8 MP 64 MP
Front camera 10 MP 50 MP
RAM 8GB 12GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 Android 17
Brightness (peak) 1900 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68/IP69
Dimensions 161.3×76.6×7.4 mm 151.8×71.9×8.1 mm
Weight 190 g 192 g
Launch price $599 $970

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 8MP
  • Front: 10MP
56
camera

Vivo X500 Pro

  • Main: 50MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 64MP
  • Front: 50MP
87
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE

  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2340
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display

Vivo X500 Pro

  • 6.4" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1216x2660
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE

  • 4700 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless: 15W
50
battery

Vivo X500 Pro

  • 6510 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
81
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy S25 FE and Vivo X500 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Samsung Exynos 2400
68/100
2087886 AnTuTu
Vivo X500 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro
90/100 +58.4%
5016623 AnTuTu

Vivo X500 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy S25 FE by 58.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE

$599

Vivo X500 Pro

$970

Launch price difference: $371. Samsung Galaxy S25 FE was $371 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (100/100 vs 80/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X500 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (94/100 vs 79/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (87/100 vs 56/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (81/100 vs 50/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE is a bit better (71/100 vs 63/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE or the Vivo X500 Pro?

The Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE by 22 points (90/100 vs 68/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE and the Vivo X500 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy S25 FE has a MobileRank rating of 68/100, the Vivo X500 Pro — 90/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE or the Vivo X500 Pro?

The Vivo X500 Pro leads on camera score (87/100 vs 56/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE or the Vivo X500 Pro?

The Vivo X500 Pro leads on performance (100/100 vs 80/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE over the Vivo X500 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy S25 FE is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X500 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.