Samsung Galaxy S25 FE vs Vivo iQOO 15T

The Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (2025) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2400, while the Vivo iQOO 15T (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $599 and $499. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15T leads — 82/100 vs 68/100 (a 14-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15T has the bigger battery (8000 mAh vs 4700); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo iQOO 15T is faster in AnTuTu (4,704,310 vs 2,000,659); the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE is noticeably lighter (190g vs 216g).

The Vivo iQOO 15T is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE — the overall rating gap is 14 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE

Performance 80
Display 79
Camera 56
Battery 50
Portability 71
Value for money 50

Vivo iQOO 15T

Performance 97
Display 99
Camera 65
Battery 75
Portability 44
Value for money 86

What makes Samsung Galaxy S25 FE better?

  • Lighter: 190g vs 216g

  • Better portability (71/100 vs 44/100)

What makes Vivo iQOO 15T better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 4704310 vs 2000659
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 2115
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 6826
  • Bigger battery: 8000 vs 4700 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Cheaper at launch: $499 vs $599

  • Higher performance (97/100 vs 80/100)
  • Better camera (65/100 vs 56/100)
  • Longer battery life (75/100 vs 50/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 79/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE vs the Vivo iQOO 15T, the Vivo iQOO 15T scores 14 points higher (82/100 vs 68/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T leads (97/100 vs 80/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T leads (75/100 vs 50/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy S25 FE — 50/100, Vivo iQOO 15T — 86/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (97/100 vs 80/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (99/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T is a bit better (65/100 vs 56/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (75/100 vs 50/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15T (71/100 vs 44/100).

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE: The Samsung Galaxy S25 FE is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Vivo iQOO 15T: The Vivo iQOO 15T is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Vivo iQOO 15T
Processor Samsung Exynos 2400 MediaTek Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 2000659 4704310
Geekbench Single 2115 3293
Geekbench Multi 6826 10243
Display 6.7" AMOLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2340 1440x3168
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 4700 mAh 8000 mAh
Charging 45W 100W
Wireless charging 15W 0W
DXOMark (camera) 118 —
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 8 MP 0 MP
Front camera 10 MP 16 MP
RAM 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 1900 nits —
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 161.3×76.6×7.4 mm —
Weight 190 g 216 g
Launch price $599 $499

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 8MP
  • Front: 10MP
56
camera

Vivo iQOO 15T

  • Main: 200MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 16MP
65
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE

  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2340
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display

Vivo iQOO 15T

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE

  • 4700 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless: 15W
50
battery

Vivo iQOO 15T

  • 8000 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • No wireless charging
75
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy S25 FE and Vivo iQOO 15T, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Samsung Exynos 2400
68/100
2000659 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 15T MediaTek Dimensity 9500
82/100 +57.5%
4704310 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 15T leads Samsung Galaxy S25 FE by 57.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE

$599

Vivo iQOO 15T

$499

Launch price difference: $100. Vivo iQOO 15T was $100 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (97/100 vs 80/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (99/100 vs 79/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T is a bit better (65/100 vs 56/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (75/100 vs 50/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15T (71/100 vs 44/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE or the Vivo iQOO 15T?

The Vivo iQOO 15T is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE — the overall rating gap is 14 points.

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE and the Vivo iQOO 15T?

The Samsung Galaxy S25 FE has a MobileRank rating of 68/100, the Vivo iQOO 15T — 82/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE or the Vivo iQOO 15T?

The Vivo iQOO 15T leads on camera score (65/100 vs 56/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE or the Vivo iQOO 15T?

The Vivo iQOO 15T leads on performance (97/100 vs 80/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE over the Vivo iQOO 15T?

The Samsung Galaxy S25 FE is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo iQOO 15T is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.