Samsung Galaxy S25 FE vs Vivo iQOO 13

The Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (2025) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2400, while the Vivo iQOO 13 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $599 and $650. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads — 84/100 vs 68/100 (a 16-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 13 has the bigger battery (6150 mAh vs 4700); the Vivo iQOO 13 is faster in AnTuTu (3,150,555 vs 2,000,659); the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE is noticeably lighter (190g vs 207g).

The Vivo iQOO 13 is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE — the overall rating gap is 16 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE

Performance 80
Display 79
Camera 56
Battery 50
Portability 71
Value for money 50

Vivo iQOO 13

Performance 91
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 73
Portability 55
Value for money 82

What makes Samsung Galaxy S25 FE better?

  • Lighter: 190g vs 207g
  • Cheaper at launch: $599 vs $650

  • Better portability (71/100 vs 55/100)

What makes Vivo iQOO 13 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3150555 vs 2000659
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 2115
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 6826
  • Bigger battery: 6150 vs 4700 mAh
  • Faster charging: 120W vs 45W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz

  • Higher performance (91/100 vs 80/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 56/100)
  • Longer battery life (73/100 vs 50/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 79/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE vs the Vivo iQOO 13, the Vivo iQOO 13 scores 16 points higher (84/100 vs 68/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (91/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (78/100 vs 56/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (73/100 vs 50/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy S25 FE — 50/100, Vivo iQOO 13 — 82/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 is a bit better (91/100 vs 80/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (99/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (78/100 vs 56/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (73/100 vs 50/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 13 (71/100 vs 55/100).

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE: The Samsung Galaxy S25 FE is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Vivo iQOO 13: The Vivo iQOO 13 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Vivo iQOO 13
Processor Samsung Exynos 2400 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 2000659 3150555
Geekbench Single 2115 3013
Geekbench Multi 6826 9287
Display 6.7" AMOLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2340 1440x3168
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 4700 mAh 6150 mAh
Charging 45W 120W
Wireless charging 15W 0W
DXOMark (camera) 118 —
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 8 MP 50 MP
Front camera 10 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 Android 15, OriginOS 5 (China)
Brightness (peak) 1900 nits —
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 161.3×76.6×7.4 mm 163.4×76.7×8.0 mm
Weight 190 g 207 g
Launch price $599 $650

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 8MP
  • Front: 10MP
56
camera

Vivo iQOO 13

  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE

  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2340
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display

Vivo iQOO 13

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE

  • 4700 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless: 15W
50
battery

Vivo iQOO 13

  • 6150 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 14:22 hrs, total 30:28 hrs
  • Wired: 120W
  • No wireless charging
73
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy S25 FE and Vivo iQOO 13, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Samsung Exynos 2400
68/100
2000659 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 13 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
84/100 +36.5%
3150555 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 13 leads Samsung Galaxy S25 FE by 36.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE

$599

Vivo iQOO 13

$650

Launch price difference: $51. Samsung Galaxy S25 FE was $51 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 is a bit better (91/100 vs 80/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (99/100 vs 79/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (78/100 vs 56/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (73/100 vs 50/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 13 (71/100 vs 55/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE or the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Vivo iQOO 13 is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE — the overall rating gap is 16 points.

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE and the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Samsung Galaxy S25 FE has a MobileRank rating of 68/100, the Vivo iQOO 13 — 84/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE or the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 56/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE or the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on performance (91/100 vs 80/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE over the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Samsung Galaxy S25 FE is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo iQOO 13 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.