Samsung Galaxy S24+ vs Vivo iQOO 15

The Samsung Galaxy S24+ (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, while the Vivo iQOO 15 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $999 and $599. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads — 86/100 vs 65/100 (a 21-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15 has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4900); the Vivo iQOO 15 is faster in AnTuTu (3,758,268 vs 1,876,702); the Samsung Galaxy S24+ is noticeably lighter (196g vs 215g).

The Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24+ by 21 points (86/100 vs 65/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy S24+

Performance 79
Display 89
Camera 40
Battery 54
Portability 65
Value for money 40

Vivo iQOO 15

Performance 94
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 85
Portability 48
Value for money 86

What makes Samsung Galaxy S24+ better?

  • Lighter: 196g vs 215g

  • Better portability (65/100 vs 48/100)

What makes Vivo iQOO 15 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3758268 vs 1876702
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 2203
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 6511
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4900 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
  • Cheaper at launch: $599 vs $999

  • Higher performance (94/100 vs 79/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 40/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 54/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 89/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S24+ vs the Vivo iQOO 15, the Vivo iQOO 15 scores 21 points higher (86/100 vs 65/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (94/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (78/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (85/100 vs 54/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy S24+ — 40/100, Vivo iQOO 15 — 86/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24+ (94/100 vs 79/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 is a bit better (99/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24+ (78/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24+ (85/100 vs 54/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S24+ notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 (65/100 vs 48/100).

Samsung Galaxy S24+: The Samsung Galaxy S24+ is a better fit for active users.
Vivo iQOO 15: The Vivo iQOO 15 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy S24+ Vivo iQOO 15
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 1876702 3758268
Geekbench Single 2203 3013
Geekbench Multi 6511 9287
Display 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 3120x1440 1440x3168
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 4900 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 45W 100W
Wireless charging 15W 40W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 10 MP 50 MP
Front camera 12 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 14 / One UI 6.1 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 2600 nits 6000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 158.5×75.9×7.7 mm 163.7×76.8×8.1 mm
Weight 196 g 215 g
Launch price $999 $599

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy S24+

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 12MP
40
camera

Vivo iQOO 15

  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy S24+

  • 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 3120x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display

Vivo iQOO 15

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy S24+

  • 4900 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless: 15W
54
battery

Vivo iQOO 15

  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 18:52 hrs, total 39:26 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy S24+ and Vivo iQOO 15, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy S24+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
65/100
1876702 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
86/100 +50.1%
3758268 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 15 leads Samsung Galaxy S24+ by 50.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy S24+

$999

Vivo iQOO 15

$599

Launch price difference: $400. Vivo iQOO 15 was $400 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24+ (94/100 vs 79/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 is a bit better (99/100 vs 89/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24+ (78/100 vs 40/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24+ (85/100 vs 54/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S24+ notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 (65/100 vs 48/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S24+ or the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24+ by 21 points (86/100 vs 65/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S24+ and the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Samsung Galaxy S24+ has a MobileRank rating of 65/100, the Vivo iQOO 15 — 86/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S24+ or the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Vivo iQOO 15 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 40/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S24+ or the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Vivo iQOO 15 leads on performance (94/100 vs 79/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S24+ over the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Samsung Galaxy S24+ is a better fit for active users. The Vivo iQOO 15 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.