Samsung Galaxy S24 FE vs Vivo X200 Ultra
The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (2024) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2400e, while the Vivo X200 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $649 and $889. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads — 86/100 vs 67/100 (a 19-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X200 Ultra has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 4700); the Vivo X200 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,092,340 vs 1,857,077); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X200 Ultra has the stronger camera (167 vs 133); the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE is noticeably lighter (213g vs 229g).
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Vivo X200 Ultra
- Lighter: 213g vs 229g
- Cheaper at launch: $649 vs $889
- Better portability (51/100 vs 34/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3092340 vs 1857077
- Better Geekbench Single: 3100 vs 1850
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10095 vs 5500
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 4700 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 25W
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 76/100)
- Better camera (93/100 vs 67/100)
- Longer battery life (78/100 vs 46/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 79/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE vs the Vivo X200 Ultra, the Vivo X200 Ultra scores 19 points higher (86/100 vs 67/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 76/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (93/100 vs 67/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 46/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy S24 FE — 46/100, Vivo X200 Ultra — 84/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (92/100 vs 76/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (93/100 vs 67/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (78/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE notably outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (51/100 vs 34/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy S24 FE | Vivo X200 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 2400e | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 1857077 | 3092340 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1850 | 3100 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 5500 | 10095 | |
| Display | 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2340x1080 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 133 | 167 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 8 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14 / One UI 6.1 | Android 15 / OriginOS 5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1900 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 162.0×77.3×8.0 mm | 163.1×76.8×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 213 g | 229 g | |
| Launch price | $649 | $889 |
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 8MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo X200 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
- 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2340x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 12:14 hrs, total 24:25 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Samsung Galaxy S24 FE and Vivo X200 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X200 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy S24 FE by 39.9% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $240. Samsung Galaxy S24 FE was $240 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (92/100 vs 76/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (93/100 vs 67/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (78/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE notably outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (51/100 vs 34/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE — the overall rating gap is 19 points.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE and the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE has a MobileRank rating of 67/100, the Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on camera score (93/100 vs 67/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 76/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE over the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X200 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.