Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra vs Vivo X300s

The Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, while the Vivo X300s (2026) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $1199 and $723. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300s leads — 89/100 vs 70/100 (a 19-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300s has the bigger battery (7100 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo X300s is faster in AnTuTu (3,703,823 vs 1,684,869); the Vivo X300s is noticeably lighter (217g vs 234g).

The Vivo X300s is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 19 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra

Performance 75
Display 88
Camera 73
Battery 56
Portability 29
Value for money 50

Vivo X300s

Performance 95
Display 94
Camera 94
Battery 83
Portability 42
Value for money 92

What makes Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra better?


  • Overall rating 70/100

What makes Vivo X300s better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3703823 vs 1684869
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 2004
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 5311
  • Bigger battery: 7100 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
  • Lighter: 217g vs 234g
  • Cheaper at launch: $723 vs $1199

  • Higher performance (95/100 vs 75/100)
  • Better camera (94/100 vs 73/100)
  • Longer battery life (83/100 vs 56/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 88/100)
  • Better portability (42/100 vs 29/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra vs the Vivo X300s, the Vivo X300s scores 19 points higher (89/100 vs 70/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s leads (95/100 vs 75/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s leads (94/100 vs 73/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s leads (83/100 vs 56/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra — 50/100, Vivo X300s — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (95/100 vs 75/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s is a bit better (94/100 vs 88/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (94/100 vs 73/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (83/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300s is a bit better (42/100 vs 29/100).

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra: The Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra is a better fit for active users.
Vivo X300s: The Vivo X300s is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Vivo X300s
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 1684869 3703823
Geekbench Single 2004 3293
Geekbench Multi 5311 10243
Display 6.8" AMOLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1440x3088 2800x1260
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 7100 mAh
Charging 45W 90W
Wireless charging 15W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 140 —
Main camera 200 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 10 MP 50 MP
Front camera 12 MP 50 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 Android 16 / OriginOS 6
Brightness (peak) 1750 nits —
NFC yes —
Protection IP68 —
Dimensions 163.4×78.1×8.9 mm —
Weight 234 g 217 g
Launch price $1199 $723

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra

  • Main: 200MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 12MP
73
camera

Vivo X300s

  • Main: 200MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
94
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3088
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
88
display

Vivo X300s

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2800x1260
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless: 15W
56
battery

Vivo X300s

  • 7100 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
83
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra and Vivo X300s, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
70/100
1684869 AnTuTu
Vivo X300s Dimensity 9500
89/100 +54.5%
3703823 AnTuTu

Vivo X300s leads Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra by 54.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra

$1199

Vivo X300s

$723

Launch price difference: $476. Vivo X300s was $476 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (95/100 vs 75/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s is a bit better (94/100 vs 88/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (94/100 vs 73/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (83/100 vs 56/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300s is a bit better (42/100 vs 29/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra or the Vivo X300s?

The Vivo X300s is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 19 points.

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra and the Vivo X300s?

The Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 70/100, the Vivo X300s — 89/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra or the Vivo X300s?

The Vivo X300s leads on camera score (94/100 vs 73/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra or the Vivo X300s?

The Vivo X300s leads on performance (95/100 vs 75/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra over the Vivo X300s?

The Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300s is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.