Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra vs Vivo iQOO 13

The Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, while the Vivo iQOO 13 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $1199 and $650. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads — 84/100 vs 70/100 (a 14-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 13 has the bigger battery (6150 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO 13 is faster in AnTuTu (3,119,308 vs 1,681,378); the Vivo iQOO 13 is noticeably lighter (207g vs 234g).

The Vivo iQOO 13 is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 14 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Performance 75
Display 88
Camera 73
Battery 56
Portability 29
Value for money 50
Vivo iQOO 13
Performance 92
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 73
Portability 55
Value for money 80
What makes Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra better?
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Overall rating 70/100
What makes Vivo iQOO 13 better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3119308 vs 1681378
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 2004
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 5311
  • Bigger battery: 6150 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 120W vs 45W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 207g vs 234g
  • Cheaper at launch: $650 vs $1199

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 75/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 73/100)
  • Longer battery life (73/100 vs 56/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 88/100)
  • Better portability (55/100 vs 29/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra vs the Vivo iQOO 13, the Vivo iQOO 13 scores 14 points higher (84/100 vs 70/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (92/100 vs 75/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (73/100 vs 56/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra — 50/100, Vivo iQOO 13 — 80/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (92/100 vs 75/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 is a bit better (99/100 vs 88/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 is a bit better (78/100 vs 73/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (73/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (55/100 vs 29/100).

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra: The Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra is a better fit for active users.
Vivo iQOO 13: The Vivo iQOO 13 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Vivo iQOO 13
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 1681378 3119308
Geekbench Single 2004 3041
Geekbench Multi 5311 9494
Display 6.8" AMOLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1440x3088 1440x3168
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 6150 mAh
Charging 45W 120W
Wireless charging 15W 0W
DXOMark (camera) 140
Main camera 200 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 10 MP 50 MP
Front camera 12 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 Android 15, OriginOS 5 (China)
Brightness (peak) 1750 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 163.4×78.1×8.9 mm 163.4×76.7×8.0 mm
Weight 234 g 207 g
Launch price $1199 $650
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
  • Main: 200MP
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 12MP
73
camera
Vivo iQOO 13
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3088
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
88
display
Vivo iQOO 13
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless: 15W
56
battery
Vivo iQOO 13
  • 6150 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 14:22 hrs, total 30:28 hrs
  • Wired: 120W
  • No wireless charging
73
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra and Vivo iQOO 13, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
70/100
1681378 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 13 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
84/100 +46.1%
3119308 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 13 leads Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra by 46.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
$1199
Vivo iQOO 13
$650

Launch price difference: $549. Vivo iQOO 13 was $549 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (92/100 vs 75/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 is a bit better (99/100 vs 88/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 is a bit better (78/100 vs 73/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (73/100 vs 56/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (55/100 vs 29/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra or the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Vivo iQOO 13 is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 14 points.

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra and the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 70/100, the Vivo iQOO 13 — 84/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra or the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 73/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra or the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on performance (92/100 vs 75/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra over the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra is a better fit for active users. The Vivo iQOO 13 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.