Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $1199 and $2899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra leads — 70/100 vs 69/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 5000); the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 1,684,869); the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra is noticeably lighter (234g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
What makes Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra better?
- Lighter: 234g vs 309g
- Cheaper at launch: $1199 vs $2899
- Better camera (73/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (88/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (29/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 1684869
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 2004
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 5311
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 5000 mAh
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 75/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 56/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra scores 1 points higher (70/100 vs 69/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 75/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra leads (73/100 vs 52/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra — 50/100, Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 46/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (90/100 vs 75/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (88/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (73/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (63/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra is a bit better (29/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 1684869 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2004 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 5311 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1440x3088 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 140 | — | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1750 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 163.4×78.1×8.9 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 234 g | 309 g | |
| Launch price | $1199 | $2899 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 12MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3088
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra by 42.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1700. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra was $1700 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (90/100 vs 75/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (88/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (73/100 vs 52/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (63/100 vs 56/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra is a bit better (29/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra edges out the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 70/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra leads on camera score (73/100 vs 52/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 75/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra is a better fit for active users. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.