Samsung Galaxy S22 vs Vivo X300 Pro

The Samsung Galaxy S22 (2022) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2200, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $799 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 56/100 (a 31-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 3700); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 1,434,169); the Samsung Galaxy S22 is noticeably lighter (168g vs 226g).

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S22 by 31 points (87/100 vs 56/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy S22
Performance 68
Display 82
Camera 39
Battery 24
Portability 83
Value for money 24
Vivo X300 Pro
Performance 93
Display 84
Camera 96
Battery 81
Portability 43
Value for money 86
What makes Samsung Galaxy S22 better?
  • Lighter: 168g vs 226g
  • Cheaper at launch: $799 vs $899

  • Better portability (83/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 1434169
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 1588
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 3958
  • Bigger battery: 6510 vs 3700 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 25W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W

  • Higher performance (93/100 vs 68/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 39/100)
  • Longer battery life (81/100 vs 24/100)
  • Better display (84/100 vs 82/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S22 vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 31 points higher (87/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 68/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 24/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy S22 — 24/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 86/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S22 (93/100 vs 68/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy S22 are nearly equal (84/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S22 (96/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S22 (81/100 vs 24/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S22 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (83/100 vs 43/100).

Samsung Galaxy S22: The Samsung Galaxy S22 is a better fit for active users.
Vivo X300 Pro: The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy S22 Vivo X300 Pro
Processor Samsung Exynos 2200 Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 1434169 3269794
Geekbench Single 1588 3228
Geekbench Multi 3958 9553
Display 6.1" AMOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 2340x1080 1260x2800
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 3700 mAh 6510 mAh
Charging 25W 90W
Wireless charging 15W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 171
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 10 MP 50 MP
Front camera 10 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 12 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 1300 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 146.0×70.6×7.6 mm 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm
Weight 168 g 226 g
Launch price $799 $899
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy S22
  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
39
camera
Vivo X300 Pro
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy S22
  • 6.1" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2340x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
82
display
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy S22
  • 3700 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
24
battery
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6510 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
81
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy S22 and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy S22 Samsung Exynos 2200
56/100
1434169 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Pro Dimensity 9500
87/100 +56.1%
3269794 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy S22 by 56.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy S22
$799
Vivo X300 Pro
$899

Launch price difference: $100. Samsung Galaxy S22 was $100 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S22 (93/100 vs 68/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy S22 are nearly equal (84/100 vs 82/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S22 (96/100 vs 39/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S22 (81/100 vs 24/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S22 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (83/100 vs 43/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S22 or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S22 by 31 points (87/100 vs 56/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S22 and the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy S22 has a MobileRank rating of 56/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S22 or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 39/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S22 or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 68/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S22 over the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy S22 is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.