Samsung Galaxy S22+ vs Vivo X300 Pro

The Samsung Galaxy S22+ (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $999 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 58/100 (a 29-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 1,290,942); the Samsung Galaxy S22+ is noticeably lighter (196g vs 226g).

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S22+ by 29 points (87/100 vs 58/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Performance 69
Display 79
Camera 39
Battery 46
Portability 64
Value for money 28
Vivo X300 Pro
Performance 93
Display 84
Camera 96
Battery 81
Portability 43
Value for money 86
What makes Samsung Galaxy S22+ better?
  • Lighter: 196g vs 226g

  • Better portability (64/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 1290942
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 1675
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 4453
  • Bigger battery: 6510 vs 4500 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
  • Cheaper at launch: $899 vs $999

  • Higher performance (93/100 vs 69/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 39/100)
  • Longer battery life (81/100 vs 46/100)
  • Better display (84/100 vs 79/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S22+ vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 29 points higher (87/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 69/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 46/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy S22+ — 28/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 86/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S22+ (93/100 vs 69/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S22+ (96/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S22+ (81/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S22+ notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (64/100 vs 43/100).

Samsung Galaxy S22+: The Samsung Galaxy S22+ is a better fit for active users.
Vivo X300 Pro: The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy S22+ Vivo X300 Pro
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 1290942 3269794
Geekbench Single 1675 3228
Geekbench Multi 4453 9553
Display 6.6" Dynamic AMOLED 2X 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 2340x1080 1260x2800
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4500 mAh 6510 mAh
Charging 45W 90W
Wireless charging 15W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 171
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 10 MP 50 MP
Front camera 10 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 12 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits
NFC yes
Protection IP68
Dimensions 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm
Weight 196 g 226 g
Launch price $999 $899
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy S22+
  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
39
camera
Vivo X300 Pro
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy S22+
  • 6.6" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2340x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy S22+
  • 4500 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless: 15W
46
battery
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6510 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
81
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy S22+ and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy S22+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
58/100
1290942 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Pro Dimensity 9500
87/100 +60.5%
3269794 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy S22+ by 60.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy S22+
$999
Vivo X300 Pro
$899

Launch price difference: $100. Vivo X300 Pro was $100 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S22+ (93/100 vs 69/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 79/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S22+ (96/100 vs 39/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S22+ (81/100 vs 46/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S22+ notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (64/100 vs 43/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S22+ or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S22+ by 29 points (87/100 vs 58/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S22+ and the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy S22+ has a MobileRank rating of 58/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S22+ or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 39/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S22+ or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 69/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S22+ over the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy S22+ is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.