Samsung Galaxy S21 FE vs Vivo X300 Pro

The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $699 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 51/100 (a 37-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 12 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 725,133); the Samsung Galaxy S21 FE is noticeably lighter (177g vs 226g).

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S21 FE by 37 points (88/100 vs 51/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy S21 FE

Performance 58
Display 80
Camera 26
Battery 42
Portability 74
Value for money 16

Vivo X300 Pro

Performance 94
Display 84
Camera 96
Battery 81
Portability 43
Value for money 88

What makes Samsung Galaxy S21 FE better?

  • Lighter: 177g vs 226g
  • Cheaper at launch: $699 vs $899

  • Better portability (74/100 vs 43/100)

What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 725133
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1500
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 3537
  • Bigger battery: 6510 vs 4500 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 25W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 12MP
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W

  • Higher performance (94/100 vs 58/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 26/100)
  • Longer battery life (81/100 vs 42/100)
  • Better display (84/100 vs 80/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S21 FE vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 37 points higher (88/100 vs 51/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 58/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 26/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 42/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy S21 FE — 16/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S21 FE (94/100 vs 58/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy S21 FE are nearly equal (84/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S21 FE (96/100 vs 26/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S21 FE (81/100 vs 42/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S21 FE significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (74/100 vs 43/100).

Vivo X300 Pro: The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy S21 FE Vivo X300 Pro
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 725133 3326259
Geekbench Single 1500 3293
Geekbench Multi 3537 10243
Display 6.4" Dynamic AMOLED 2X 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 2340x1080 1260x2800
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4500 mAh 6510 mAh
Charging 25W 90W
Wireless charging 15W 40W
DXOMark (camera) — 171
Main camera 12 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 8 MP 50 MP
Front camera 32 MP 32 MP
RAM 6GB / 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 12 Android 16
Brightness (peak) — 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 155.7×74.5×7.9 mm 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm
Weight 177 g 226 g
Launch price $699 $899

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy S21 FE

  • Main: 12MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 8MP
  • Front: 32MP
26
camera

Vivo X300 Pro

  • Main: 200MP f/1.57
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy S21 FE

  • 6.4" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2340x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
80
display

Vivo X300 Pro

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy S21 FE

  • 4500 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
42
battery

Vivo X300 Pro

  • 6510 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
81
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy S21 FE and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy S21 FE Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
51/100
725133 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Pro Dimensity 9500
88/100 +78.2%
3326259 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy S21 FE by 78.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy S21 FE

$699

Vivo X300 Pro

$899

Launch price difference: $200. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE was $200 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S21 FE (94/100 vs 58/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy S21 FE are nearly equal (84/100 vs 80/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S21 FE (96/100 vs 26/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S21 FE (81/100 vs 42/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S21 FE significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (74/100 vs 43/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S21 FE or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S21 FE by 37 points (88/100 vs 51/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S21 FE and the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE has a MobileRank rating of 51/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S21 FE or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 26/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S21 FE or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 58/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S21 FE over the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.