Samsung Galaxy Note 9 vs Vivo iQOO 13
The Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (2018) runs on the Samsung Exynos 9810, while the Vivo iQOO 13 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $1000 and $650. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads — 84/100 vs 37/100 (a 47-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 13 has the bigger battery (6150 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 12 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO 13 is faster in AnTuTu (3,150,555 vs 594,285).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
Vivo iQOO 13
What makes Samsung Galaxy Note 9 better?
- Lighter: 201g vs 207g
- Overall rating 37/100
What makes Vivo iQOO 13 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3150555 vs 594285
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 744
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 1863
- Bigger battery: 6150 vs 4000 mAh
- Faster charging: 120W vs 15W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 12MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 60Hz
- Cheaper at launch: $650 vs $1000
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 43/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 15/100)
- Longer battery life (73/100 vs 29/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 65/100)
- Better portability (55/100 vs 50/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Note 9 vs the Vivo iQOO 13, the Vivo iQOO 13 scores 47 points higher (84/100 vs 37/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (91/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (78/100 vs 15/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (73/100 vs 29/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy Note 9 — 0/100, Vivo iQOO 13 — 82/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (91/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (99/100 vs 65/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (78/100 vs 15/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (73/100 vs 29/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 is a bit better (55/100 vs 50/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Note 9 | Vivo iQOO 13 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 9810 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 594285 | 3150555 | |
| Geekbench Single | 744 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1863 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.4" Super AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2960x1440 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 6150 mAh | |
| Charging | 15W | 120W | |
| Wireless charging | 10W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 8.1 | Android 15, OriginOS 5 (China) | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 161.9×76.4×8.8 mm | 163.4×76.7×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 201 g | 207 g | |
| Launch price | $1000 | $650 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
- Main: 12MP f/1.5
- Telephoto: 12MP
- Front: 8MP
Vivo iQOO 13
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
- 6.4" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 2960x1440
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
- 4000 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- Wireless: 10W
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6150 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 14:22 hrs, total 30:28 hrs
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy Note 9 and Vivo iQOO 13, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 13 leads Samsung Galaxy Note 9 by 81.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $350. Vivo iQOO 13 was $350 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (91/100 vs 43/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (99/100 vs 65/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (78/100 vs 15/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (73/100 vs 29/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 is a bit better (55/100 vs 50/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Note 9 or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Note 9 by 47 points (84/100 vs 37/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Note 9 and the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Samsung Galaxy Note 9 has a MobileRank rating of 37/100, the Vivo iQOO 13 — 84/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Note 9 or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 15/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Note 9 or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on performance (91/100 vs 43/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Note 9 over the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.