Samsung Galaxy M35 vs Vivo X500 Pro
The Samsung Galaxy M35 (2024) runs on the Exynos 1380, while the Vivo X500 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X500 Pro leads — 90/100 vs 51/100 (a 39-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X500 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 6000); the Vivo X500 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (5,016,623 vs 767,711); the Vivo X500 Pro is noticeably lighter (192g vs 222g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy M35
Vivo X500 Pro
What makes Samsung Galaxy M35 better?
- Overall rating 51/100
What makes Vivo X500 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 5016623 vs 767711
- Better Geekbench Single: 4188 vs 1008
- Better Geekbench Multi: 13145 vs 2710
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 6000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 25W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 192g vs 222g
- Higher performance (100/100 vs 53/100)
- Better camera (87/100 vs 34/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 79/100)
- Better portability (63/100 vs 34/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy M35 vs the Vivo X500 Pro, the Vivo X500 Pro scores 39 points higher (90/100 vs 51/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 Pro leads (100/100 vs 53/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 Pro leads (87/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 Pro leads (81/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M35 (100/100 vs 53/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X500 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M35 (94/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M35 (87/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M35 (81/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X500 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M35 (63/100 vs 34/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy M35 | Vivo X500 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Exynos 1380 | MediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro | |
| AnTuTu | 767711 | 5016623 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1008 | 4188 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2710 | 13145 | |
| Display | 6.6" Super AMOLED | 6.4" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 1216x2660 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14, One UI 6.1 | Android 17 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1000 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 162.3×78.6×9.1 mm | 151.8×71.9×8.1 mm | |
| Weight | 222 g | 192 g | |
| Launch price | — | $970 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy M35
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 13MP
Vivo X500 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 64MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy M35
- 6.6" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X500 Pro
- 6.4" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1216x2660
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy M35
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X500 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy M35 and Vivo X500 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X500 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy M35 by 84.7% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy M35
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M35 (100/100 vs 53/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X500 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M35 (94/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M35 (87/100 vs 34/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M35 (81/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X500 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M35 (63/100 vs 34/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy M35 or the Vivo X500 Pro?
The Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M35 by 39 points (90/100 vs 51/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy M35 and the Vivo X500 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy M35 has a MobileRank rating of 51/100, the Vivo X500 Pro — 90/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy M35 or the Vivo X500 Pro?
The Vivo X500 Pro leads on camera score (87/100 vs 34/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy M35 or the Vivo X500 Pro?
The Vivo X500 Pro leads on performance (100/100 vs 53/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy M35 over the Vivo X500 Pro?
The Vivo X500 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.