Samsung Galaxy M35 vs Vivo Y77 (China)

The Samsung Galaxy M35 (2024) runs on the Exynos 1380, while the Vivo Y77 (China) (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 930. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy M35 leads — 51/100 vs 45/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy M35 has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 4500); the Samsung Galaxy M35 is faster in AnTuTu (767,711 vs 593,307); the Samsung Galaxy M35 has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y77 (China) doesn't; the Vivo Y77 (China) is noticeably lighter (194g vs 222g).

The Samsung Galaxy M35 edges out the Vivo Y77 (China) by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy M35

Performance 53
Display 79
Camera 34
Battery 52
Portability 34
Value for money —

Vivo Y77 (China)

Performance 47
Display 66
Camera 30
Battery 45
Portability 56
Value for money —

What makes Samsung Galaxy M35 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 767711 vs 593307
  • Better Geekbench Single: 1008 vs 915
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 2710 vs 2299
  • Bigger battery: 6000 vs 4500 mAh

  • Higher performance (53/100 vs 47/100)
  • Better camera (34/100 vs 30/100)
  • Longer battery life (52/100 vs 45/100)
  • Better display (79/100 vs 66/100)

What makes Vivo Y77 (China) better?

  • Faster charging: 80W vs 25W
  • Lighter: 194g vs 222g

  • Better portability (56/100 vs 34/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy M35 vs the Vivo Y77 (China), the Samsung Galaxy M35 scores 6 points higher (51/100 vs 45/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy M35 is a bit better (53/100 vs 47/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy M35 is a bit better (79/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy M35 and the Vivo Y77 (China) are nearly equal (34/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy M35 is a bit better (52/100 vs 45/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M35 (56/100 vs 34/100).

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy M35 Vivo Y77 (China)
Processor Exynos 1380 MediaTek Dimensity 930
AnTuTu 767711 593307
Geekbench Single 1008 915
Geekbench Multi 2710 2299
Display 6.6" Super AMOLED 6.6" IPS LCD
Resolution 1080x2340 1080x2388
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 6000 mAh 4500 mAh
Charging 25W 80W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 0 MP
Front camera 13 MP 8 MP
RAM 6GB / 8GB 6GB / 8GB / 12GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 14, One UI 6.1 Android 12, Origin OS Ocean
Brightness (peak) 1000 nits —
NFC yes no
Dimensions 162.3×78.6×9.1 mm 164.2×75.8×8.6 mm
Weight 222 g 194 g
Launch price — —

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy M35

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 13MP
34
camera

Vivo Y77 (China)

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Front: 8MP
30
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy M35

  • 6.6" Super AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2340
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display

Vivo Y77 (China)

  • 6.6" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 1080x2388
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
66
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy M35

  • 6000 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • No wireless charging
52
battery

Vivo Y77 (China)

  • 4500 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • No wireless charging
45
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy M35 and Vivo Y77 (China), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy M35 Exynos 1380
51/100
767711 AnTuTu
Vivo Y77 (China) MediaTek Dimensity 930
45/100 -29.4%
593307 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy M35 leads Vivo Y77 (China) by 29.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy M35 is a bit better (53/100 vs 47/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy M35 is a bit better (79/100 vs 66/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy M35 and the Vivo Y77 (China) are nearly equal (34/100 vs 30/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy M35 is a bit better (52/100 vs 45/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M35 (56/100 vs 34/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy M35 or the Vivo Y77 (China)?

The Samsung Galaxy M35 edges out the Vivo Y77 (China) by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy M35 and the Vivo Y77 (China)?

The Samsung Galaxy M35 has a MobileRank rating of 51/100, the Vivo Y77 (China) — 45/100.

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy M35 or the Vivo Y77 (China)?

The Samsung Galaxy M35 leads on performance (53/100 vs 47/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy M35 over the Vivo Y77 (China)?

Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is portability — better on the Vivo Y77 (China) (56/100 vs 34/100).