Samsung Galaxy M17e vs Vivo X300s
The Samsung Galaxy M17e (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6300, while the Vivo X300s (2026) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $140 and $723. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300s leads — 89/100 vs 43/100 (a 46-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300s has the bigger battery (7100 mAh vs 6000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300s is faster in AnTuTu (3,703,823 vs 524,785); the Samsung Galaxy M17e is noticeably lighter (199g vs 217g).
Samsung Galaxy M17e
Vivo X300s
- Lighter: 199g vs 217g
- Cheaper at launch: $140 vs $723
- Better portability (57/100 vs 42/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3703823 vs 524785
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 771
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 1980
- Bigger battery: 7100 vs 6000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 25W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 43/100)
- Better camera (94/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 55/100)
- Better value for money (90/100 vs 64/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy M17e vs the Vivo X300s, the Vivo X300s scores 46 points higher (89/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s leads (94/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s leads (94/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s leads (83/100 vs 52/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300s leads (90/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17e (94/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17e (94/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17e (94/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17e (83/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17e notably outperforms the Vivo X300s (57/100 vs 42/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17e (90/100 vs 64/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy M17e | Vivo X300s | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 524785 | 3703823 | |
| Geekbench Single | 771 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1980 | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.7" PLS LCD | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 2800x1260 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 7100 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 | Android 16 / OriginOS 6 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 800 nits | — | |
| NFC | no | — | |
| Protection | IP54 | — | |
| Dimensions | 167.4×77.4×8.2 mm | — | |
| Weight | 199 g | 217 g | |
| Launch price | $140 | $723 |
Samsung Galaxy M17e
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Vivo X300s
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy M17e
- 6.7" PLS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300s
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2800x1260
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Samsung Galaxy M17e
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300s
- 7100 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Samsung Galaxy M17e and Vivo X300s, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300s leads Samsung Galaxy M17e by 85.8% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $583. Samsung Galaxy M17e was $583 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17e (94/100 vs 43/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17e (94/100 vs 55/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17e (94/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17e (83/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17e notably outperforms the Vivo X300s (57/100 vs 42/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17e (90/100 vs 64/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy M17e or the Vivo X300s?
The Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17e by 46 points (89/100 vs 43/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy M17e and the Vivo X300s?
The Samsung Galaxy M17e has a MobileRank rating of 43/100, the Vivo X300s — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy M17e or the Vivo X300s?
The Vivo X300s leads on camera score (94/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy M17e or the Vivo X300s?
The Vivo X300s leads on performance (94/100 vs 43/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy M17e over the Vivo X300s?
The Samsung Galaxy M17e is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300s is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.