Samsung Galaxy M17e vs Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
The Samsung Galaxy M17e (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6300, while the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500M; launch prices were $140 and $548. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads — 75/100 vs 43/100 (a 32-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra has the bigger battery (9100 mAh vs 6000); the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,579,952 vs 528,398); the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Samsung Galaxy M17e doesn't; the Samsung Galaxy M17e is noticeably lighter (199g vs 225g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy M17e
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
What makes Samsung Galaxy M17e better?
- Lighter: 199g vs 225g
- Cheaper at launch: $140 vs $548
- Better portability (57/100 vs 38/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3579952 vs 528398
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 771
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 1980
- Bigger battery: 9100 vs 6000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 25W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (95/100 vs 43/100)
- Better camera (35/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (80/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 55/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy M17e vs the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra scores 32 points higher (75/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads (95/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads (80/100 vs 52/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy M17e — 62/100, Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra — 68/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17e (95/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17e (99/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a bit better (35/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17e (80/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17e notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (57/100 vs 38/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy M17e | Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500M | |
| AnTuTu | 528398 | 3579952 | |
| Geekbench Single | 771 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1980 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.7" PLS LCD | 6.8" LTPS AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 1440x3200 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 9100 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 100W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 | Android 16 / OriginOS 6 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 800 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP54 | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 167.4×77.4×8.2 mm | 163.4×75.9×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 225 g | |
| Launch price | $140 | $548 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy M17e
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.88
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy M17e
- 6.7" PLS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPS AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3200
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy M17e
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
- 9100 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy M17e and Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy M17e by 85.2% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $408. Samsung Galaxy M17e was $408 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17e (95/100 vs 43/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17e (99/100 vs 55/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a bit better (35/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17e (80/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17e notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (57/100 vs 38/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy M17e or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17e by 32 points (75/100 vs 43/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy M17e and the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy M17e has a MobileRank rating of 43/100, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra — 75/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy M17e or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads on camera score (35/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy M17e or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads on performance (95/100 vs 43/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy M17e over the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.