Lava Play Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy M17e

The Lava Play Ultra (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300, while the Samsung Galaxy M17e (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6300; launch prices were $175 and $140. By overall MobileRank rating, the Lava Play Ultra leads — 53/100 vs 43/100 (a 10-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy M17e has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 64 MP vs 50 MP; the Lava Play Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (879,714 vs 528,398); the Lava Play Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Samsung Galaxy M17e doesn't; the Lava Play Ultra is noticeably lighter (182g vs 199g).

The Lava Play Ultra is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy M17e — the overall rating gap is 10 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Lava Play Ultra

Performance 55
Display 79
Camera 39
Battery 46
Portability 71
Value for money 74

Samsung Galaxy M17e

Performance 43
Display 55
Camera 30
Battery 52
Portability 57
Value for money 62

What makes Lava Play Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 879714 vs 528398
  • Better Geekbench Single: 1011 vs 771
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 2813 vs 1980
  • Faster charging: 33W vs 25W
  • Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
  • Lighter: 182g vs 199g

  • Higher performance (55/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better camera (39/100 vs 30/100)
  • Better display (79/100 vs 55/100)
  • Better portability (71/100 vs 57/100)

What makes Samsung Galaxy M17e better?

  • Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
  • Cheaper at launch: $140 vs $175

  • Longer battery life (52/100 vs 46/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Lava Play Ultra vs the Samsung Galaxy M17e, the Lava Play Ultra scores 10 points higher (53/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Lava Play Ultra leads (55/100 vs 43/100). Value score: Lava Play Ultra — 74/100, Samsung Galaxy M17e — 62/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Lava Play Ultra is a bit better (55/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Lava Play Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17e (79/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Lava Play Ultra is a bit better (39/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17e is a bit better (52/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Lava Play Ultra is a bit better (71/100 vs 57/100).

Specs comparison

Specification Lava Play Ultra Samsung Galaxy M17e
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 7300 MediaTek Dimensity 6300
AnTuTu 879714 528398
Geekbench Single 1011 771
Geekbench Multi 2813 1980
Display 6.7" AMOLED 6.7" PLS LCD
Resolution 1080x2400 720x1600
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 6000 mAh
Charging 33W 25W
Main camera 64 MP 50 MP
Front camera 13 MP 8 MP
RAM 6GB / 8GB 4GB / 6GB
Storage 128GB 128GB
OS Android 15 Android 16, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 8
Brightness (peak) 1000 nits 800 nits
NFC yes no
Protection IP64 IP54
Dimensions 162.1×75.4×7.8 mm 167.4×77.4×8.2 mm
Weight 182 g 199 g
Launch price $175 $140

Camera comparison

Lava Play Ultra

  • Main: 64MP
  • Front: 13MP
39
camera

Samsung Galaxy M17e

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Front: 8MP
30
camera

Display comparison

Lava Play Ultra

  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display

Samsung Galaxy M17e

  • 6.7" PLS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1600
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
55
display

Battery and charging

Lava Play Ultra

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 33W
  • No wireless charging
46
battery

Samsung Galaxy M17e

  • 6000 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • No wireless charging
52
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Lava Play Ultra and Samsung Galaxy M17e, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Lava Play Ultra MediaTek Dimensity 7300
53/100
879714 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy M17e MediaTek Dimensity 6300
43/100 -66.5%
528398 AnTuTu

Lava Play Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy M17e by 66.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Lava Play Ultra

$175

Samsung Galaxy M17e

$140

Launch price difference: $35. Samsung Galaxy M17e was $35 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Lava Play Ultra is a bit better (55/100 vs 43/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Lava Play Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17e (79/100 vs 55/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Lava Play Ultra is a bit better (39/100 vs 30/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17e is a bit better (52/100 vs 46/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Lava Play Ultra is a bit better (71/100 vs 57/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Lava Play Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy M17e?

The Lava Play Ultra is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy M17e — the overall rating gap is 10 points.

What is the rating of the Lava Play Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy M17e?

The Lava Play Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 53/100, the Samsung Galaxy M17e — 43/100.

Which has the better camera: the Lava Play Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy M17e?

The Lava Play Ultra leads on camera score (39/100 vs 30/100).

Which is more powerful: the Lava Play Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy M17e?

The Lava Play Ultra leads on performance (55/100 vs 43/100).

Should you choose the Lava Play Ultra over the Samsung Galaxy M17e?

Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is display — better on the Lava Play Ultra (79/100 vs 55/100).