Samsung Galaxy M14 5G vs Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
The Samsung Galaxy M14 5G (2023) runs on the Samsung Exynos 1330, while the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 1300. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) leads — 31/100 vs 26/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) doesn't.
Samsung Galaxy M14 5G
Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
- Better value for money (98/100 vs 55/100)
- Faster charging: 44W vs 15W
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Lighter: 203g vs 206g
- Better camera (27/100 vs 26/100)
- Longer battery life (51/100 vs 45/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 50/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (46/100 vs 42/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G vs the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022), the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) scores 5 points higher (31/100 vs 26/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G leads (98/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) and the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G are nearly equal (27/100 vs 26/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) is a bit better (51/100 vs 45/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) and the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G are nearly equal (46/100 vs 42/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) (98/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy M14 5G | Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 1330 | MediaTek Dimensity 1300 | |
| AnTuTu | 607137 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 952 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1963 | — | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 6.6" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 2408x1080 | 1080x2408 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 15W | 44W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 6GB / 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 166.8×77.2×9.4 mm | 163.9×75.3×9.2 mm | |
| Weight | 206 g | 203 g | |
| Price | $179 | — |
Samsung Galaxy M14 5G
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 13MP
Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy M14 5G
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 2408x1080
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2408
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy M14 5G
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G (100/100 vs 50/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) and the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G are nearly equal (27/100 vs 26/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) is a bit better (51/100 vs 45/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) and the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G are nearly equal (46/100 vs 42/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) (98/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G or the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)?
The Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) edges out the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G and the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)?
The Samsung Galaxy M14 5G has a MobileRank rating of 26/100, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) — 31/100.
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G over the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)?
The Samsung Galaxy M14 5G is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) is a better fit for everyday use.