Samsung Galaxy M13 (India) vs Vivo X300 Pro

The Samsung Galaxy M13 (India) (2022) runs on the Exynos 850, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 33/100 (a 54-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 6000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 234,339); the Vivo X300 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Samsung Galaxy M13 (India) doesn't; the Samsung Galaxy M13 (India) is noticeably lighter (207g vs 226g).

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 (India) by 54 points (87/100 vs 33/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy M13 (India)
Performance 16
Display 57
Camera 32
Battery 51
Portability 40
Value for money
Vivo X300 Pro
Performance 93
Display 84
Camera 96
Battery 81
Portability 43
Value for money 86
What makes Samsung Galaxy M13 (India) better?
  • Lighter: 207g vs 226g

  • Overall rating 33/100
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 234339
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 300
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 836
  • Bigger battery: 6510 vs 6000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 15W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (93/100 vs 16/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 32/100)
  • Longer battery life (81/100 vs 51/100)
  • Better display (84/100 vs 57/100)
  • Better portability (43/100 vs 40/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy M13 (India) vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 54 points higher (87/100 vs 33/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 16/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 51/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 (India) (93/100 vs 16/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 (India) (84/100 vs 57/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 (India) (96/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 (India) (81/100 vs 51/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy M13 (India) are nearly equal (43/100 vs 40/100).

Samsung Galaxy M13 (India): The Samsung Galaxy M13 (India) is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo X300 Pro: The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy M13 (India) Vivo X300 Pro
Processor Exynos 850 Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 234339 3269794
Geekbench Single 300 3228
Geekbench Multi 836 9553
Display 6.6" PLS LCD 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2408 1260x2800
Refresh rate 120 Hz
Battery 6000 mAh 6510 mAh
Charging 15W 90W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 171
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 5 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 8 MP 32 MP
RAM 4GB / 6GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 64GB / 128GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 12, One UI Core 4 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits
NFC no yes
Protection IP68
Dimensions 165.4×76.9×9.3 mm 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm
Weight 207 g 226 g
Launch price $899
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy M13 (India)
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 5MP
  • Front: 8MP
32
camera
Vivo X300 Pro
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy M13 (India)
  • 6.6" PLS LCD
  • Resolution: 1080x2408
  • Refresh rate: —
57
display
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy M13 (India)
  • 6000 mAh
  • Wired: 15W
  • No wireless charging
51
battery
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6510 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
81
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy M13 (India) and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy M13 (India) Exynos 850
33/100
234339 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Pro Dimensity 9500
87/100 +92.8%
3269794 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy M13 (India) by 92.8% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy M13 (India)
Price unknown
Vivo X300 Pro
$899
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 (India) (93/100 vs 16/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 (India) (84/100 vs 57/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 (India) (96/100 vs 32/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 (India) (81/100 vs 51/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy M13 (India) are nearly equal (43/100 vs 40/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy M13 (India) or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 (India) by 54 points (87/100 vs 33/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy M13 (India) and the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy M13 (India) has a MobileRank rating of 33/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy M13 (India) or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 32/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy M13 (India) or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 16/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy M13 (India) over the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy M13 (India) is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.