Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global) vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global) (2022) runs on the Exynos 850, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 32/100 (a 55-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 234,339); the Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global) is noticeably lighter (192g vs 226g).
Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global)
Vivo X300 Pro
- Lighter: 192g vs 226g
- Better portability (60/100 vs 43/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 234339
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 300
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 836
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 15W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 16/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 32/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 54/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global) vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 55 points higher (87/100 vs 32/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 16/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global) (93/100 vs 16/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global) (84/100 vs 54/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global) (96/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global) (81/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global) notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (60/100 vs 43/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global) | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Exynos 850 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 234339 | 3269794 | |
| Geekbench Single | 300 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 836 | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.6" PLS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2408 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 15W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 12, One UI Core 4.1 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 165.4×76.9×8.4 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 192 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | — | $899 |
Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 8MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global)
- 6.6" PLS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2408
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global)
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global) and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global) by 92.8% in our overall performance rating.
Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global)
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global) (93/100 vs 16/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global) (84/100 vs 54/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global) (96/100 vs 32/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global) (81/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global) notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (60/100 vs 43/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global) or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global) by 55 points (87/100 vs 32/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global) and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global) has a MobileRank rating of 32/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global) or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 32/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global) or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 16/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global) over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global) is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.