Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 vs Vivo Y77 (China)

The Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 (2016) runs on the Samsung Exynos 7870, while the Vivo Y77 (China) (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 930. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo Y77 (China) leads — 29/100 vs 9/100 (a 20-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y77 (China) has the bigger battery (4500 mAh vs 3300); the main camera is 13 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y77 (China) doesn't; the Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 is noticeably lighter (170g vs 194g).

The Vivo Y77 (China) significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 by 20 points (29/100 vs 9/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
Performance 0
Display 0
Camera 0
Battery 0
Design 87
Value for money 92
Vivo Y77 (China)
Performance 0
Display 100
Camera 24
Battery 39
Design 57
Value for money 55
What makes Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 better?
  • Lighter: 170g vs 194g

  • Better design/ergonomics (87/100 vs 57/100)
  • Better value for money (92/100 vs 55/100)
What makes Vivo Y77 (China) better?
  • Bigger battery: 4500 vs 3300 mAh
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz

  • Better camera (24/100 vs 0/100)
  • Longer battery life (39/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 vs the Vivo Y77 (China), the Vivo Y77 (China) scores 20 points higher (29/100 vs 9/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) leads (24/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) leads (39/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 leads (92/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 (24/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 (39/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y77 (China) (87/100 vs 57/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y77 (China) (92/100 vs 55/100).

Samsung Galaxy J7 2016: The Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Vivo Y77 (China): The Vivo Y77 (China) is a better fit for everyday use.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 Vivo Y77 (China)
Processor Samsung Exynos 7870 MediaTek Dimensity 930
AnTuTu 192269
Geekbench Single 172
Geekbench Multi 492
Display 5.5" AMOLED 6.6" IPS LCD
Resolution 1080x2388
Refresh rate 60 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 3300 mAh 4500 mAh
Charging 80W
Main camera 13 MP 50 MP
Front camera 5 MP 8 MP
RAM 2GB 6GB / 8GB / 12GB
Storage 16GB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 12, Origin OS Ocean
NFC yes no
Dimensions 151.7×76.0×7.8 mm 164.2×75.8×8.6 mm
Weight 170 g 194 g
Price $260
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
  • Main: 13MP
  • Front: 5MP
0
camera
Vivo Y77 (China)
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Front: 8MP
24
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
  • 5.5" AMOLED
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
0
display
Vivo Y77 (China)
  • 6.6" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 1080x2388
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
  • 3300 mAh
  • No wireless charging
0
battery
Vivo Y77 (China)
  • 4500 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • No wireless charging
39
battery
Benchmarks
Price and availability
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
$260
Vivo Y77 (China)
Price unknown
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 (100/100 vs 0/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 (24/100 vs 0/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 (39/100 vs 0/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y77 (China) (87/100 vs 57/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y77 (China) (92/100 vs 55/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 or the Vivo Y77 (China)?

The Vivo Y77 (China) significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 by 20 points (29/100 vs 9/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 and the Vivo Y77 (China)?

The Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 has a MobileRank rating of 9/100, the Vivo Y77 (China) — 29/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 or the Vivo Y77 (China)?

The Vivo Y77 (China) leads on camera score (24/100 vs 0/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 over the Vivo Y77 (China)?

The Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo Y77 (China) is a better fit for everyday use.