Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 vs Vivo Y32t
The Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 (2016) runs on the Samsung Exynos 7870, while the Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo Y32t leads — 11/100 vs 9/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y32t has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 3300); the Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y32t doesn't.
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
Vivo Y32t
- Lighter: 170g vs 179g
- Better design/ergonomics (87/100 vs 76/100)
- Better value for money (92/100 vs 55/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 3300 mAh
- Longer battery life (36/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 vs the Vivo Y32t, the Vivo Y32t scores 2 points higher (11/100 vs 9/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t leads (36/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 leads (92/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 (36/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 is a bit better (87/100 vs 76/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (92/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 | Vivo Y32t | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 7870 | MediaTek Helio P70 () | |
| AnTuTu | 192269 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 172 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 492 | — | |
| Display | 5.5" AMOLED | 6.5" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | — | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 3300 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | — | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 2GB | — | |
| Storage | 16GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | — | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 151.7×76.0×7.8 mm | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 170 g | 179 g | |
| Price | $260 | — |
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 5MP
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
- 5.5" AMOLED
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
- 3300 mAh
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 (36/100 vs 0/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 is a bit better (87/100 vs 76/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (92/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 or the Vivo Y32t?
The Vivo Y32t edges out the Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 and the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 has a MobileRank rating of 9/100, the Vivo Y32t — 11/100.
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 over the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo Y32t is a better fit for everyday use.