Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 vs Vivo iQOO Z11
The Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 (2016) runs on the Samsung Exynos 7870, while the Vivo iQOO Z11 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8500; estimated prices are $260 and $290. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Z11 leads — 51/100 vs 9/100 (a 42-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Z11 has the bigger battery (9020 mAh vs 3300); the main camera is 13 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO Z11 is faster in AnTuTu (2,612,264 vs 192,269); the Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 is noticeably lighter (170g vs 228g).
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
Vivo iQOO Z11
- Lighter: 170g vs 228g
- Cheaper: $260 vs $290
- Better design/ergonomics (87/100 vs 15/100)
- Better value for money (92/100 vs 90/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 2612264 vs 192269
- Better Geekbench Single: 1553 vs 172
- Better Geekbench Multi: 6403 vs 492
- Bigger battery: 9020 vs 3300 mAh
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 60Hz
- Higher performance (41/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (27/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (77/100 vs 0/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 vs the Vivo iQOO Z11, the Vivo iQOO Z11 scores 42 points higher (51/100 vs 9/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11 leads (41/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11 leads (27/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11 leads (77/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 (41/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 (27/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 (77/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z11 (87/100 vs 15/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 and the Vivo iQOO Z11 are nearly equal (92/100 vs 90/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 | Vivo iQOO Z11 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 7870 | MediaTek Dimensity 8500 | |
| AnTuTu | 192269 | 2612264 | |
| Geekbench Single | 172 | 1553 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 492 | 6403 | |
| Display | 5.5" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | — | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 165 Hz | |
| Battery | 3300 mAh | 9020 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 90W | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 2GB | 8GB / 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 16GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | — | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 5000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 151.7×76.0×7.8 mm | 163.7×76.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 170 g | 228 g | |
| Price | $260 | $290 |
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 5MP
Vivo iQOO Z11
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
- 5.5" AMOLED
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Vivo iQOO Z11
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
- 3300 mAh
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Z11
- 9020 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- No wireless charging
We compared Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 and Vivo iQOO Z11, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO Z11 leads Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 by 92.6% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $30. Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 is cheaper by $30.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 (41/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 (27/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 (77/100 vs 0/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z11 (87/100 vs 15/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 and the Vivo iQOO Z11 are nearly equal (92/100 vs 90/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 or the Vivo iQOO Z11?
The Vivo iQOO Z11 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 by 42 points (51/100 vs 9/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 and the Vivo iQOO Z11?
The Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 has a MobileRank rating of 9/100, the Vivo iQOO Z11 — 51/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 or the Vivo iQOO Z11?
The Vivo iQOO Z11 leads on camera score (27/100 vs 0/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 or the Vivo iQOO Z11?
The Vivo iQOO Z11 leads on performance (41/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 over the Vivo iQOO Z11?
The Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo iQOO Z11 is a better fit for those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.