Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs Vivo iQOO Z11
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo iQOO Z11 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8500; estimated prices are $2899 and $290. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 57/100 vs 51/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Z11 has the bigger battery (9020 mAh vs 5600); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 2,612,264); the Vivo iQOO Z11 is noticeably lighter (228g vs 309g).
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Vivo iQOO Z11
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 2612264
- Better Geekbench Single: 3050 vs 1553
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9300 vs 6403
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (67/100 vs 41/100)
- Better camera (49/100 vs 27/100)
- Bigger battery: 9020 vs 5600 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 228g vs 309g
- Cheaper: $290 vs $2899
- Longer battery life (77/100 vs 52/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (15/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (90/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs the Vivo iQOO Z11, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 6 points higher (57/100 vs 51/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (67/100 vs 41/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (49/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11 leads (77/100 vs 52/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11 leads (90/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z11 (67/100 vs 41/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z11 (49/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (77/100 vs 52/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (15/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (90/100 vs 0/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | Vivo iQOO Z11 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 8500 | |
| AnTuTu | 2926532 | 2612264 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3050 | 1553 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9300 | 6403 | |
| Display | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2160x1584 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 165 Hz | |
| Battery | 5600 mAh | 9020 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 8GB / 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | 5000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | 163.7×76.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 309 g | 228 g | |
| Price | $2899 | $290 |
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo iQOO Z11
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO Z11
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo iQOO Z11
- 9020 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- No wireless charging
We compared Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and Vivo iQOO Z11, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Vivo iQOO Z11 by 12.0% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $2609. Vivo iQOO Z11 is cheaper by $2609.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z11 (67/100 vs 41/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z11 (49/100 vs 27/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (77/100 vs 52/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (15/100 vs 0/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (90/100 vs 0/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo iQOO Z11?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold edges out the Vivo iQOO Z11 by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Vivo iQOO Z11?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has a MobileRank rating of 57/100, the Vivo iQOO Z11 — 51/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo iQOO Z11?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (49/100 vs 27/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo iQOO Z11?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (67/100 vs 41/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold over the Vivo iQOO Z11?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for active users. The Vivo iQOO Z11 is a better fit for those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.