Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 vs Vivo iQOO 13
The Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 (2016) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 410, while the Vivo iQOO 13 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $220 and $650. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads — 84/100 vs 16/100 (a 68-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 13 has the bigger battery (6150 mAh vs 3100); the main camera is 13 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 is noticeably lighter (159g vs 207g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
Vivo iQOO 13
What makes Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 better?
- Lighter: 159g vs 207g
- Cheaper at launch: $220 vs $650
- Better portability (82/100 vs 55/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 13 better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 99
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 319
- Bigger battery: 6150 vs 3100 mAh
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 60Hz
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (73/100 vs 15/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 51/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 vs the Vivo iQOO 13, the Vivo iQOO 13 scores 68 points higher (84/100 vs 16/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (91/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (78/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (73/100 vs 15/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 — 0/100, Vivo iQOO 13 — 82/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 (91/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 (99/100 vs 51/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 (78/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 (73/100 vs 15/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 13 (82/100 vs 55/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | Vivo iQOO 13 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | — | 3150555 | |
| Geekbench Single | 99 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 319 | 9287 | |
| Display | 5.2" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | — | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 3100 mAh | 6150 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 120W | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 2GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 16GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | — | Android 15, OriginOS 5 (China) | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 145.8×72.3×8.1 mm | 163.4×76.7×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 159 g | 207 g | |
| Launch price | $220 | $650 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 5MP
Vivo iQOO 13
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
- 5.2" AMOLED
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
- 3100 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6150 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 14:22 hrs, total 30:28 hrs
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $430. Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 was $430 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 (91/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 (99/100 vs 51/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 (78/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 (73/100 vs 15/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 13 (82/100 vs 55/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 by 68 points (84/100 vs 16/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 and the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 has a MobileRank rating of 16/100, the Vivo iQOO 13 — 84/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on performance (91/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 over the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.