Samsung Galaxy F17 vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Samsung Galaxy F17 (2025) runs on the Exynos 1330, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 47/100 (a 40-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 607,137); the Samsung Galaxy F17 is noticeably lighter (192g vs 226g).
Samsung Galaxy F17
Vivo X300 Pro
- Lighter: 192g vs 226g
- Better portability (69/100 vs 43/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 607137
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 952
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 1963
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 25W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 47/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 33/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 44/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 67/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy F17 vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 40 points higher (87/100 vs 47/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 47/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F17 (93/100 vs 47/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F17 (84/100 vs 67/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F17 (96/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F17 (81/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy F17 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (69/100 vs 43/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy F17 | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Exynos 1330 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 607137 | 3269794 | |
| Geekbench Single | 952 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1963 | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.7" Super AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1100 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP54 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 164.4×77.9×7.5 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 192 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | — | $899 |
Samsung Galaxy F17
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 13MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy F17
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy F17
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Samsung Galaxy F17 and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy F17 by 81.4% in our overall performance rating.
Samsung Galaxy F17
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F17 (93/100 vs 47/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F17 (84/100 vs 67/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F17 (96/100 vs 33/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F17 (81/100 vs 44/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy F17 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (69/100 vs 43/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy F17 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F17 by 40 points (87/100 vs 47/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy F17 and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy F17 has a MobileRank rating of 47/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy F17 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 33/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy F17 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 47/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy F17 over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy F17 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.