Samsung Galaxy F15 vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Samsung Galaxy F15 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 44/100 (a 47-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 513,809); the Vivo X300 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Samsung Galaxy F15 doesn't; the Vivo X300 Ultra is thinner (8.2mm vs 9.3mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy F15
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Samsung Galaxy F15 better?
- Lighter: 217g vs 230g
- Overall rating 44/100
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 513809
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 688
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 1900
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 25W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 41/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 33/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 67/100)
- Better portability (39/100 vs 34/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy F15 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 47 points higher (91/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 41/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F15 (99/100 vs 41/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F15 (89/100 vs 67/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F15 (96/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F15 (85/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (39/100 vs 34/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy F15 | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 513809 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 688 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1900 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.6" Super AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14, One UI 6 | Android 16 | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 160.1×76.8×9.3 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 217 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy F15
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 13MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy F15
- 6.6" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy F15
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy F15 and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy F15 by 87.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy F15
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F15 (99/100 vs 41/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F15 (89/100 vs 67/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F15 (96/100 vs 33/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F15 (85/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (39/100 vs 34/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy F15 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F15 by 47 points (91/100 vs 44/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy F15 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy F15 has a MobileRank rating of 44/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy F15 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 33/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy F15 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 41/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy F15 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.