Samsung Galaxy F05 vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Samsung Galaxy F05 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Helio G85, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 33/100 (a 58-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 348,562); the Vivo X300 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Samsung Galaxy F05 doesn't; the Samsung Galaxy F05 is noticeably lighter (195g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy F05
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Samsung Galaxy F05 better?
- Lighter: 195g vs 230g
- Better portability (53/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 348562
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 419
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 1461
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 25W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 29/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 44/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 32/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy F05 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 58 points higher (91/100 vs 33/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 29/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F05 (99/100 vs 29/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F05 (89/100 vs 32/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F05 (96/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F05 (85/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy F05 is a bit better (53/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy F05 | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G85 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 348562 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 419 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1461 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.7" | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 64GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades, One UI Core 6.0 | Android 16 | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 168.8×78.2×8.8 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 195 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy F05
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy F05
- 6.7"
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy F05
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy F05 and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy F05 by 91.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy F05
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F05 (99/100 vs 29/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F05 (89/100 vs 32/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F05 (96/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F05 (85/100 vs 44/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy F05 is a bit better (53/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy F05 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F05 by 58 points (91/100 vs 33/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy F05 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy F05 has a MobileRank rating of 33/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy F05 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy F05 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 29/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy F05 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.