Samsung Galaxy A70 vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Samsung Galaxy A70 (2019) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $410 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 39/100 (a 49-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 32 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 480,034); the Samsung Galaxy A70 is noticeably lighter (183g vs 226g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy A70
Vivo X300 Pro
What makes Samsung Galaxy A70 better?
- Lighter: 183g vs 226g
- Cheaper at launch: $410 vs $899
- Better portability (70/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 480034
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 671
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 1695
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 4500 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 32MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 39/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 28/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 39/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 51/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A70 vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 49 points higher (88/100 vs 39/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 28/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 39/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy A70 — 4/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A70 (94/100 vs 39/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A70 (84/100 vs 51/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A70 (96/100 vs 28/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A70 (81/100 vs 39/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A70 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (70/100 vs 43/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A70 | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 480034 | 3326259 | |
| Geekbench Single | 671 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1695 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | — | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 32 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | — | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 164.3×76.7×7.9 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 183 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | $410 | $899 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy A70
- Main: 32MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy A70
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy A70
- 4500 mAh
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy A70 and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy A70 by 85.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $489. Samsung Galaxy A70 was $489 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A70 (94/100 vs 39/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A70 (84/100 vs 51/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A70 (96/100 vs 28/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A70 (81/100 vs 39/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A70 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (70/100 vs 43/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A70 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A70 by 49 points (88/100 vs 39/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A70 and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy A70 has a MobileRank rating of 39/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A70 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 28/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A70 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 39/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A70 over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.